Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Councillvfinutes <br />September 19, 2005 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />3.6. REQUEST BY NEW CENTURY LAND DEVELOPMENT FOR <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT (HERITAGE MAPLES), PUBLIC HEARING- <br />CASE NO. P 05-16 - postponed to October 17, 2005 <br />3.7. REQUEST BY NEW CENTURY LAND DEVELOPMENT FOR <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT <br />DEVELOPMENT, PUBLIC HEARING - CASE NO. CD 05-17 - <br />postponed to October 17, 2005 <br />3.8. PAY ESTIMATES <br />3.9. TOBACCO LICENSE FOR WESTBOUND LIQUOR <br />3.10. REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY ONSALE 3.20/0 MALT LIQUOR <br />LICENSE FOR ELK RIVER LIONS <br />3.11. AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE STREET DEPARTMENT <br />SWEEPER <br />3.12. PROCLAMATION - OCTOBER 2005 AS TOASTMASTERS MONTH IN <br />THE CITY OF ELK RIVER <br /> <br />MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />4. Open :Mike <br /> <br />Patrick and Cheryl Melich, 13735 214th Avenue - presented a petition from a group of <br />residents in the Windsor Park 3rd j\ddition that would like to see the barriers at 212th <br />_I\venue NW removed. Mr. Melich reviewed a variety of reasons why the residents believe <br />the barriers should be removed. <br /> <br />City Engineer Terry Maurer indicated that when the Windsor Meadows plat was presented <br />to the Planning Commission a few residents of the \Vindsor Park 1 st and 2nd Additions came <br />before the Commission and argued for and received a condition on the \"X7indsor Meadows <br />plat that the connection from 212th Avenue stay blocked not only during construction but <br />until either the finalliEt of blacktop \vas laid or until at least 500/0 of the homes were <br />occupied. Ivir. 11aurer stated that the condition made sense at the time but the \X1incisor <br />Meadows development did not move fonvard as quickly as anticipated. He stated that now <br />that the \"X1indsor Meadows development is moving forward the \X1incisor Park 3rd Addition <br />is about 750/0 occupied, it vlould make sense to remove the barriers. 1vlr. Maurer suggested <br />that the condition should have been for the barriers to remain in place until the fust lift of <br />black top has been laid rather than the final lift. He stated that in the West Oaks <br />development, the condition '\vas for the barriers to remain until the first lift of black top had <br />been laid \vruch kept a majority of the construction traffic out and there ha\le no complaints <br />since the barriers have been removed. :Mr. Maurer noted that staff cannot remove the <br />barriers until direction is received from the City Council because the barrier condition was <br />added as part of the \Xiincisor Meadows plat approval and is part of the developer's <br />agreement. <br /> <br />Mayor I<J.inzing questioned '\V~hat steps would have to be taken to have the barriers removed. <br />City Attorney Peter Beck indicated that if the condition is part of the developer's agreement <br />. it is a contract and should be amended if the barriers are to be removed. Mr. Maurer <br />indicated that he spoke to the developer of\,\lindsor Meadovls and he does not have a <br />problem \vith removing the barriers. City Attorney Peter Beck indicated that as long as the <br />developer does not have a problem, then the barriers could be removed now and the <br />developer's agreement could be amended later. <br />