Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FIGURE 5. IN FILL <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />BEFORE <br /> <br />STABLE USES TO REMAIN <br /> <br /> <br />REDEVELOPABLE <br />.SUPERBLDCK" <br /> <br />REDEVELOPABLE AND <br />-UNDERTILlZEO LOTS <br /> <br />AFTER <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />NEW INFILL WITH TRADITIONAL <br />BLOCK-AND-LOT PATTERN <br /> <br />I~ <br />J~fu <br />II~].':. <br />..........,. <br />0.." ': ,'" _~ .,', , -' '. .'.: ,. C,-, -. ...." .. " " <br />c ,__;:_.. '.dn.>' _'_ '-., <br /> <br /> <br />Development of vacant and underused sites and repair and renovation <br />of older. structures strengthens existing urban areas. This is accomplished <br />through innovative approaches to building codes as well as zoning regulations. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />STIMULATING INFILL AND REHABILITATION ACTIVITY <br /> <br />Adjust minimum lot-size and setback requirements to reflect the small- <br />est practical lots in the neighborhood. Increase allowable densities in infill <br />locations to promote economically viable projects that will ad,d vitality to <br />the neighborhood. This may require relief from parking requirements in <br />order to avoid the need for variances. <br /> <br />Expedite development review. Streamline review and permitting proce- <br />dures for infill projects below a specified size threshold for projects in com- <br />pliance with New Urbanist design standards. Delegate review to staff where <br />legally permissible. <br /> <br />Change. parking require111.ents. Reduce or eliminate on-site parking <br />requirements for small-lot infill projects, allowing parking demand to be <br />fully or partially satisfied by on-street, shared, or remote parking (Figure 6). <br /> <br />Revise building codes. Revise building codes to remove provisions that <br />require rehabilitation of older buildings to current standards except when <br /> <br />Chapter 1. New Urbanist Essentials 19 <br /> <br />Established neigllborhoods benefit when <br />vacant and undentsed parcels are <br />replaced by development that brings <br />positive actiuity and "eyes on the <br />street." Subdivision ~f large lots can <br />allow a traditional block and lot <br />pattern to be established, with new <br />buildings fronting directly 011 <br />the street and a renewed focus on <br />the public realm. <br /> <br />FIGURE 6. ON-SITE PARKING <br /> <br />GARAGE-FREE FRONT YIELDS <br />ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING <br />AND PEDESTRIAN COMFORT <br /> <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />...""> ~ CURB CUT OISPLACES <br />REDUIRED GARAGE ADDS ON.STREET PARKING <br />CONSTRUCTION COSTS <br /> <br />On-site parking requirements add <br />sigl1~ficant construction costs, which pose <br />a problem for the deLlelopers of small <br />infill projects. lA/hen placed in front, on- <br />site parking also makes streets less livable. <br />Curb cuts displace oil-street parA.'ing, and <br />dri"ueways remOL'e landscaping and <br />'windows from the pedestrian environment. <br />