03-31-1987 PC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . PAGE 8 Planning Commission Minutes March 31, 1987 It was noted that in the August 15, 1983 minutes there was a motion made and carried to increase Block 2 from 20 to 30 units. Len McLaughlin, Developer, stated that in Barrington Replat #5, there was an allotment for 30 units, only 24 of which are being utilized. In this particular project the total allotted amount of units would only be extended by one. Commissioner request was increase from amended. Fuchs clarified that in the August to increase from 20 to 40 units. 20 units to 30, a motion was made, and 15, 1983 minutes the This was amended to the motion passed as Stephen Rohlf stated that it is correct that the current allotment is 30 units and apologized for not catching it. Density is part of the PUD agreement and a conditional use permit would be necessary in order to increase to 40 units. In fairness to the developer, it was the general consensus that the Planning Commission would review the plat as proposed with 40 units, but the developers would be required to obtain a conditional use permit for 40 units. The Planning Commission would continue the process on this contingent. The Developer of Barrington increase the density to make up developer has the authority gets the plat approved. questioned going back to Replat #5 and for lost lots. It was clarified that the to go up to 30 units (currently 24) if he Rohlf stated permit. questioned it could the be density of Replat #6 with the current layout. He contingent upon obtaining a the conditional use Commissioner Temple questioned the amount of green space on the plat. Rohlf pointed out that there is 20% green space which is required. Stephen Rohlf stated that even though there will be a private roadway through the plat, you must expect some through traffic. Rohlf's main concern is that, with the current layout, the people must back directly out of the garages onto the road. The positioning of garages was then a topic of discussion. Chairman Wilson opened the public hearing. Julie Kastendick verbally drew a picture for the Planning Commission of what one goes by on Highway 169; trailer park, multi-family, single family. Ms. Kastenday questioned what the results of these various types of developments are going to be. Jack Holmes, a neighboring property owner, showed great concern in this plat with the number of enlargements it is going through and asked that the Planning Commission take this into consideration.