My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-31-1987 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1980 - 1989
>
1987
>
03-31-1987 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:33 AM
Creation date
9/19/2005 3:20:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
3/31/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />PAGE 6 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />March 31, 1987 <br /> <br />i I MINIMUM NUMBER orr STREET PA1U(ING SPACES BE EQUAL TO THE NUMBER OF <br />IMPLOYEES PLUS'l'WO. AND MUST BE HARDSURFACED; <br /> <br />2. LIGH'l'ING DIRECTED AWAY FROM ADJACENT RESIDENCES AND RIGHT-OF-WAY; <br /> <br />3. HOURS OF OPERATION UNTIL 9:00 P.M. FOR SALES; <br /> <br />4. SIGNAGE BE 32 <br />ADVERTISE <br /> <br />SQUARE FEET FOR THE MODEL HOME AND 96 SQUARE FEET TO <br />DEERFIELD 2ND SUBDIVISION. <br /> <br />.5. REVIEW IN TWO YEARS WITH COUNCIL APPROVAL NEEDED FOR EXTENSION. <br />COMMISSIONER KIMBALL SECONDED THE MOTION. <br /> <br />Commissioner Barrett pointed out <br />advertise Deerfield 2nd Addition. <br />stipulation. <br /> <br />the 96 square footage of sign to <br />Commissioner Fuchs agreed to this as a <br /> <br />THE MOTION CARRIED 7-0. <br /> <br />8. Consideration of Preliminary Plat Review of Royal Oak Ridge by Gerald <br />Smith/Public Hearing <br /> <br />Gerald Smith was present to present the preliminary plat of Royal Oak <br />Ridge to the Planning Commission and the public. Mr. Smith stated that <br />the plat does not have all the necessary information because this is a <br />City proj ecL <br /> <br />Stephen Rohlf stated that this is currently not a City project. He <br />continued by saying that there was a lack of information because certain <br />items were not submitted within the time frame satisfied, including the <br />grading plan for review. Rohlf suggested that if the Planning Commission <br />does decide to approve this plat, it should be contingent upon two <br />items: <br /> <br />1. The Developer must have grading plan for Terry Maurer's Review prior <br />to Council review. <br /> <br />2. The developer petitioning the City to make this a City Project. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fuchs questioned whether or not the developer knew what was <br />required before bringing this plat before the Planning Commission. He <br />further noted that the plat showed the zoning to be R-1c which is <br />incorrect. He noted the correct zoning is R-1b. <br /> <br />Stephen Rohlf briefly explained the procedure the City goes by when a <br />person wants to develope a piece of property. He explained the steps <br />necessary and the reviews along the way. <br /> <br />Bill Harju, Soil Conservation, did a soils report on the property without <br />the necessary information from the developers. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.