03-22-1988 PC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 5 . Planning Commission Minutes March 22, 1988 10. THAT THI BUILDING BE BAKED ENAMEL COLORED STEEL INCLUDING THE ROOF, II IT IS STIIPll THAN A 1/2 IN 12 PITCH. THAT THERE BE TWO PILLARS, 4 rT. IN WIDTH ON THE I'RONT CORNERS OF BOTH BUILDINGS ON THE SITE AND A MINIMUM 01' 3 FT. HIGH AND 15 FT. FROM EACH CORNER OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE OF THE NEW BUILDING. 11. THAT A PA1U.CING STALL IS ILIMINATED IN FRONT OF EACH EXIT FROM THE BUILDING AND THAT ALL DRIVES BE A MINIMUM OF 20 FT. IN WIDTH FREE OF OBSTRUCTION AS PER THE FIRE CHIEF'S RECOMMENDATION. COMMISnONll lUCRS SICONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 6-0. 7. Consider Variance Request by Mark Zieska/P.H. Stephen Rohlf, Building & Zoning Administrator explained that Mr. Zieska does not meet the five standards for granting a variance. Wanting a second building on a lot does not constitute a hardship. Mr. Zieska's building could be accomplished on this lot without a variance. Therefore, staff is recommending denial of the 15 ft. encroachment on the 20 ft. sideyard setback. . Chairman Kropuenske reviewed the five standards for a variance and felt he could not vote for this variance as the five standards are not met. He felt we had to stay uniform in our variance procedures and not set a precedent. Staff was recommending denial for this variance because it did not constitute a hardship. Commissioner Kimball also felt because Mr. Zieska does not meet the standards for a variance he could not approve this request. (;i_I ~~I@WI IAlUTT MOnD TO llCOMMBND TO THE CIn COUNCIL TO DENY THE VAlIANCI lilQUIST rOR MARK ZIISK' S SICOND BUILDING AS IT DOES NOT MEET THE fIVI ITAfI)Am)S 1'01 A VAlIANCE. COMMISSIONER MORTON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0. 8. Consider Zone Change Request by Dennis Anderson/Public Hearing Stephen Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator explained that Mr. Anderson is requesting a zone change on a parcel of property from R- 1C/Sing1e Family Residential to R-2B/Townhouse and Multi-Family Residential. Probably the most intensive principal use of R-2B zoned property is a 4 unit townhouse or multi-family dwelling. Commissioner Kropuenske cautioned the Planning Commission a zone change should be consider by itself and not in conjuction with another matter due to the fact zone changes can not have conditions set upon them. . Chairman Kropuenske opened the public hearing. Carol Mills representative of Guardian Angels Nursing Home, stated that she was in favor of this request. She felt that Mr. Anderson's development was of good quality. There being no further comments from the public, Chairman Kropuenske closed the public hearing.