Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Mintues <br />June 27, 1989 <br /> <br />Kathryn Benson of 540 A Auburn Place was concerned that the property <br />values in the area would decrease. <br /> <br />Gerald Knapp of <br />taking place in <br />potential traffic <br /> <br />115 5th Street was concerned with commercial activities <br />this area. Mr. Knapp was also concerned with the <br />problems generated by the developed of this site. <br /> <br />Mike Skoquist of 105 5th Street was concerned with the traffic in this <br />area. <br /> <br />Mary Miller of 540 C Auburn Place was concerned with the density of <br />residential development in this area. Ms. Miller was also concerned with <br />the amount of traffic in this area. <br /> <br />Greg Prosterick stated that high density residential will create more <br />traffic than what is presently taking place on this site. <br /> <br />Dick Enstad of 18801 <br />property. He indicated <br />do nothing with. He <br />property. <br /> <br />Zumbro stated that he was the realtor for this <br />that this piece of property was too expensive to <br />stated that something will be done with this <br /> <br />Kathryn Benson <br />berm could be <br />development on <br /> <br />of 540A Auburn Place questioned <br />installed on the east property <br />this property. <br /> <br />whether plantings and a <br />line to help screen any <br /> <br />Tim West <br />zoning. He <br />nature. <br /> <br />of 19757 <br />further <br /> <br />Irving <br />stated <br /> <br />indicated <br />that this <br /> <br />that he was in favor of the C-3 <br />area is currently commercial in <br /> <br />Commissioner Eberley stated <br />being developed as C-3. <br />compromise for this parcel. <br /> <br />that she was not in favor of the entire area <br />She stated that she would consider the <br /> <br />Mrs. Cone stated that when she purchased her townhouse, she did not <br />forsee this area being developed as commercial. <br /> <br />At this time Chairman Kimball closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fuchs stated that he was not in favor of the C-3 zoning <br />classification. He felt that the C-2 zoning classification on the west <br />portion of property and townhouses on the east portion would be more <br />appropriate. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson also <br />zoning classification. She <br />residential on the east side <br /> <br />stated that she was not in favor of the C-3 <br />stated that she would be in favor of <br />of the property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Morton was in agreement with Commissioner Fuchs and <br />Johnson. He indicated that this property currently has poor access. He <br />also felt that the C-3 zoning classification wasn't appropriate. <br /> <br />3. <br />