My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-28-1989 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1980 - 1989
>
1989
>
02-28-1989 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:32 AM
Creation date
9/19/2005 3:03:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
2/28/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission <br />2/28/89 <br /> <br />Doug Hipsag of Elk River questioned the synthetic liner and height of the <br />ash pile. Chris Kreger explained that a liner would fit in with the <br />design of the current landfill. The buffer zone of trees would be left <br />as is. Mr. Hipsag was also concerned about the contamination of wells <br />around the landfill. <br /> <br />Don Sherper of Elk River was opposed to the request as he felt it was <br />wrong to approve the Conditional Use Permit. Northern States Power and <br />UPA didn't consider Elk River Landfill as a disposal site, so the intent <br />was to not allow ash other than that generated from Sherburne County. <br /> <br />Don Horvath of 22715 Baldwin Was opposed to this request. By allowing <br />this request, he felt his property values would go down. <br /> <br />Steve Rohlf noted that he had received information from Dr. T. Steen <br />which he would like to show as being part of the record. He further <br />explained that staff's memo had made reference to a number of documents. <br />These documents are all part of the public record. Mr. Rohlf further <br />explained they were too numberous and bulky to copy and anyone one <br />wishing to review these at City Hall, may do so. <br /> <br />There was <br />only and <br />ilie P~ <br />temporary <br />process of <br />possibi1ty <br />all design <br /> <br />discussion on whether or not the application was for storage <br />not for a permanent disposal. John Lichter explained that if <br />were to review the proposal, they would issue a permit for <br />ash storage under the current regulations. The PCA is in the <br />developing regulations for permanent ash disposal. There is a <br />the storage site could become a permanent site if they meet <br />criteria for a disposal site. <br /> <br />Dave Se11ergren, City Attorney noted that the application that has been <br />presented to P~ for this facility perdicted a time frame of 3-1/2 years. <br />Mr. Kreger responded that his proposed temporary ash disposal site could <br />be for more than five years in order for the ash to be removed to a <br />permanent site. <br /> <br />Tom Woods was concerned about the ash and questioned whether this ash was <br />going to be covered. Mr. Woods further indicated that he had seen a <br />video tape of actual ash piles filmed around the country. Ash blew when <br />the wind blew, kids having fun with three wheelers on top of the ash <br />landfill. Mr. Kreger noted that chances are there won't be any ash flying <br />around, if this should occur, the ash would be covered and moistened. <br /> <br />Commissioner Schroeder questioned the burning of municipal waste at very <br />high temperatures and what affect this would have on heavy metals. <br /> <br />John Lichter explained that metals are an element and you can not destroy <br />an element. <br /> <br />7. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.