Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />1/24/89 <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson was also concerned with the double and triple <br />frontage lots. Commissioner Johnson further felt that Lots 4 and 5. Block <br />1 have only 25 ft. fronting on 6-1/2 Street. Lots 4. 5. 6. and 7. Block <br />1 were also very small lots. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fuchs questioned the scale used for the drawings of the <br />plat. He felt uncomfortable with the driveways. Mr. Santwire explained <br />that the driveways were 12 ft. wide at the street. flared out at the <br />building. determined by a single or double garage. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fuchs felt that there was only two standards for a <br />conditional use that the petitioner met. Commissioner Fuchs was in <br />agreement with the concept of single family homes but felt there were too <br />many homes in that small area. Commissioner Fuchs further indicated that <br />he was concerned about the lots with double and triple frontage. <br /> <br />Commissioner Morton concurred with Commissioner Fuchs that there were too <br />many home in that small of an area. Commissioner Morton did support <br />single family homes in the area. Commissioner Morton further indicated <br />he was concerned about the double and triple frontage lots. <br /> <br />Commissioner <br />f ami! y homes <br />lots proposed. <br /> <br />Schroeder indicated that he had a preference for single <br />over townhouses. He would rather see 16 lots than the 19 <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER rUCHS MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO DENY THE <br />REQUEST FOR THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE REPLATTING OF BLOCK 2. <br />BARRINGTON PLACE/PUD BY THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ELK RIVER BECAUSE OF <br />TOO MANY UNITS PROPOSED FOR THE PLAT. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD S 1. 2 AND 7 <br />FOR A CONDITIONAL USE, ALSO LOT SIZE IS TOO SMALL AND ADDITIONAL <br />TRAFFIC FLOW IN THE AREA. COMMISSIONER MORTON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE <br />MOTION CARRIED 6-1. COMMISSIONER OLSEN VOTED NAY. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Consider Zone Change Request by Erwin Specht/Public Hearing <br /> <br />Stephen Rohlf. Building & Zoning Administrator. indicated that <br />Erwin Specht is requesting a zone change on this parcel from I-1/Light <br />Industrial to C-3/Highway Commercial. This property was recently <br />identified in the City's Growth Management Plan as a potential industrial <br />area and was recently zoned I-1. Staff was in approval of the C-3 zone <br />change. <br /> <br />Stephen Rohlf explained the three reasons for legally approving a zone <br />change request; compatibility with Comprehensive Plan. change in <br />circumstances since plan was adopted or error when plan was adopted. <br /> <br />Vice Chairman Kimball opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Erwin Specht of 16330 Highway 10 explained that Saxon <br />interested in buying the property to erect a new building. <br />reason he was requesting a zone change. <br /> <br />Motors was <br />This was the <br />