Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />November 27, 1990 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />would like to see a decent building put up, if it would help clean up <br />the yard. <br /> <br />Susan Hagen of 18913 Boston Street asked who enforces the stipulations <br />if this conditional use permit were to be approved. Mr. Rohlf stated <br />that this would be done through the zoning office, and the permit will <br />be reviewed every two years to see that the conditions are met. <br /> <br />Marlene Klug of 18929 Boston Street was concerned with the junk in Mr. <br />Nitz's yard which included junk car parts, chassis for a car etc. Ms. <br />Klug asked how many vehicles a residence would be allowed to have. Mr. <br />Rohlf stated that three inoperable vehicles would be considered a junk <br />yard. Mr. Nitz indicated they only have one inoperable vehicle. <br /> <br />Chairman Kimball closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />It was the general consensus of the Planning Commission that if they <br />granted the conditional use permit they would like all junk vehicles <br />and parts kept in the garage. Mr. Nitz stated that the reason for his <br />request was to use the building for storage so he could clean up his <br />property. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER EBERLEY MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF <br />THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A 1,260 SQ. FT. DETACHED <br />ACCESSORY BUILDING TO BE USED FOR STORAGE BASED ON STAFF"S MEMO DATED <br />11/15/90 SITING THE SEVEN STANDARDS AS OUTLINED IN STAFF'S MEMO WITH <br />THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: <br /> <br />1. THAT THE APPLICANT MUST SUBMIT ENGINEERED DRAWINGS WITH THE <br />BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. <br /> <br />2. THAT THE BUILDING IS TO BE USED FOR STORAGE ONLY. <br /> <br />3. THAT THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING WILL MATCH THE EXISTING HOUSE. <br /> <br />4. THAT WHEN THE NEW BUILDING IS COMPLETED, THE METAL SKINNED SHED <br />MUST BE REMOVED. <br /> <br />5. THAT ALL INOPERABLE VEHICLES AND CAR PARTS BE KEPT IN THE NEW <br />FACILITY AND FURTHER THAT IF THIS CONDITION IS NOT MET, IT COULD <br />RESULT IN THE REVOCATION OF THIS PERMIT. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER JOHNSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 7-0. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />Consider Variance Request on Fronta~e for a Lot by Don Rahn/P.H. <br /> <br />Steve Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator, explained this request <br />indicating that Mr. Rahn of 12992 Orono Road is requesting a 66 foot <br />variance on the amount of frontage required for a lot in the R-lb <br />zone. Mr. Rohlf reviewed both the lot split and the variance as stated <br />in his memo dated 11/16/90. Staff felt that Mr. Rahn met the five <br />standards for granting a variance and was recommending approval. <br />