05-22-1990 PC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 1990 Page 2 e 6. Planninj;{ CO!Dmission Reo..resentative to Atteng Council Meetinj;{ on June 18 _L.JJ!9J! It was indicated that Commissioners Johnson and Fuchs would attend the June 18, 1990, City Council meeting. 7. Condi tion~!_U~permtLJ~or _ C~nt1!.!!!.in.ll.teci_S.Qi1-Tr..~at!!len-1-E1!Q..iU tL.l:>-Y Con t_eckLP . H~ Steve Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator, indicated that the Planning Commission should only approve the conditional use permit if they find that the seven standards for granting a conditional use permit can be met. Chairman Kimball opened the public hearing. . Commissioner Eberley stated that she would like to wait until the final draft of the permit from MPCA is received before making a final decision as this could be subject to change. e Commissioner Johnson indicated she would like to see a continuous monitoring of the flue gas temperatures instead of every 15 minutes as stated in MPCA permit. She indicated that if odor because a problem, she would like the City to reserve the right to require the stack height for the facility to be raised. Staff was in agreement. Commissioner Johnson stated that regarding Conteck's letter of 4/15/90, opacity is not addressed in the fugitive dust portion of MPCA's permit. She would like to see this addressed. John Litcher stated that opacity is not a legitimate test for fugitive dust. Commissioner Johnson indicated that .1 grain per day standard cubic foot for particulates be change to .04 the same as for asphalt processing plants. The following questions and issues were raised by the Planning Commission: MPCA's Permit It was the general consensus of the Planning Commission that they would like to wait for the final draft from MPCA before making a final decision as this could be subject to change. Staff stated that if MPCA doesn't issue a permit there can be no operation. Staff stated that the most the City Council can do is approve the conditional use permit contingent upon MPCA's approval. e Relatio_nship- between the Elk River____IJandfill. Inc. and ConteQ_k Environmental Services The Planning Commission was concerned with the legality between Elk River Landfill, Inc. and Conteck Environmental Services. Mr. Kreger addressed this issue indicating that Conteck was the applicant. Steve Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator, stated that it is customary to have the fee owner of the property (Elk River Landfill) involved as co-signer of the application to legitimize the use of the property. Mr. Kreger indicated that Elk River Landfill will be accepting and storing temporarily contaminated soils according to their industrial waste management plan. The storage site and the processor are two different