03-27-1990 PC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Minutes 3/27/90 Page 4 e Mr. Enstad felt that the land use map was in error, as this was looked at as commercial, but not added as commercial. Chairman Kimball opened the public hearing. Mary Jo Nelson indicated she was concerned with what kind of businesses would be allowed if this parcel would be approved for commercial. Commissioner Nadeau reviewed the principle and conditional uses that would be allowed in a C-3 zone. All seven of the property owners who petitioned for the zone change request were present for this issue. Warren Hudson - 1154 6th Street questioned the uses permitted in a R-3 zone. Commission Nadeau reviewed these uses. Barb Marcia - 1234 6th Street indicated that she was concerned with her taxes being raised and how the rezoning would affect them. Al Osborn - 622 Proctor questioned who would be responsible for the assessments if their property was to be sold. Chairman Kimball closed the public hearing. - e Chairman Kimball reviewed Bill Weber's memo dated March 19, 1990 regarding his concerns and considerations to this request. Tim Keane, City Attorney, suggested considering an alternative and more comprehensive approach to the development of the site. Mr. Keane further indicated there is a high likelihood that if this parcel was rezoned without any further controls, you would see piece meal development. Mr. Keane indicated that he would recommend a PUD as this would assure some degree of control. Mr. Keane stated that the problem with the mechanism of rezoning is that once a parcel is rezoned you are basically giving your blessing to all the permitted uses that may be developed individually and collectively. Dick Enstad addressed the issue of the parcel being rezoned PUD. He indicated it would be difficult to do a PUD when you have seven different property owners because everyone has different ideas on what they would want to see done with this property. After discussing this issue, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission that they were in agreement with the City Attorney. The best way to properly develop this property would be a PUD so as to assure some degree of control. e COMMISSIONER JOHNSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL DENIAL OF THE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST FROM R-3 TOWNHOUSE/MULTIFAMILY TO C-3/HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL BASED ON THE FINDINGS AS OUTLINED IN BILL WEBER'S MEMO DATED 3/19/90. COMMISSIONER EBERLEY SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0.