Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />October 22, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Steve Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator, reviewed the three <br />ponds that were not added to the shoreland ordinance because of their <br />size. They included Little Twin Lake located in Heavenly Hills, and <br />ponds in the Westwood and School View 1st subdivisions. He stated that <br />these areas won't be requi red to comply wi th the shoreland setback <br />regulations because it would eliminate lots that already exist. <br /> <br />Richard Gruys of 22347 Monroe Street stated that he was planning to do <br />some logging of trees on his property and also questioned whether the <br />farming of this land was grandfathered-in and how the shore land <br />ordinance would affect him. Mr. Rohlf stated that the grandfathered-in <br />agricultural use would be allowed to remain, but that any expansions of <br />these types of uses would need to comply with the shoreland standards. <br />As far as logging was concerned, clear-cutting was prohibited under the <br />new standards. <br /> <br />Mr. Gruys further stated that Little Twin Lake was four to five times <br />bigger than the pot hole that was located on his property and he felt <br />that his pond should also be considered one of the optional lakes. <br />Gary Schmitz explained that in classifying water bodies, the size of <br />the basin may go beyond where the actual water lies, therefore, even <br />though the one lake looks smaller on the surface it may have a bigger <br />basin. Mr. Gruys was also concerned with the County ditch (Trott <br />Brook) and questioned whether the City was going to maintain Trott <br />Brook to see that it doesn't flood. He was also concerned with the <br />beavers in the area. Dale Homuth stated that on any State protected <br />watercourse, the landowner is responsible to keep it open. The DNR <br />does not have funded money to maintain these brooks. <br /> <br />Tom McNair of 22175 Grant Street questioned how the new shoreland <br />ordinance would affect previously platted lots along the Mississippi <br />Ri vel' as far as buildability. Steve Rohlf stated that as long as all <br />setbacks could be met, existing legal lots of record would still be <br />considered bui ldable as long as a conforming septic system could be <br />placed on the lot. Ms. Szklarski added that the Mississippi River is <br />protected under a separate ordinance titled the "Wild and Scenic River <br />Management Ordinance." <br /> <br />Lou Bown of 1596 Stillwater Avenue, St. Paul stated that they owned <br />lake cottages on the Elk River at the end of Waco Street and also <br />questioned if they were grandfathered- in. Mr. Bown further stated that <br />they have been restricted from adding on or expanding to their <br />buildings. Mr. Rohlf stated that they would be restricted from <br />building in that location because of the floodplain ordinance. He <br />stated that Mr. Bown's structures were grandfathered-in with <br />limitations on building or expanding. This is separate from shoreland <br />regulations. <br /> <br />Bill Christian indicated he was concerned with a 40 acre parcel on <br />County Road 33 and Quincy as to whether the trees could be cut wi thin <br />1,000 ft. of the water. Ms. Szklarski stated that some trees can be <br />cut but no clear cutting would be allowed on the site. <br />