My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-03-1991 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1990 - 1999
>
1991
>
09-03-1991 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:30 AM
Creation date
9/12/2005 3:30:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
9/3/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Page 28 <br /> <br />Cliff - Gerry as far as the correcting of Lot 12 - are you going to be <br />bringing his backup to the existing ones? <br /> <br />Gerry - I will take a look at it to see where we are responsible and where <br />we are not. The lots that we corrected, were going to take care of that <br />problem. We didn't have anything to do with his lot. The lots that we <br />corrected and the silt is going down into Lisa's back yard because of what <br />we corrected. We have to take care of that. We will take of those lots <br />(12, 13, & 14) or whatever they are because that is where the problem lies. <br /> <br />Cliff - I think at this point between you and Gerry, as far as the fill, it <br />is going to help you once he gets this to a 4 to 1 slope. As far as who is <br />going to bring the fill in that is up to you and Gerry. <br /> <br />Brad - That will be up to Gerry as I brought the fill in once. <br /> <br />Gerry - You and I will get together and see how much of a problem it really <br />is on your lot. Well look at it. <br /> <br />LOT 20 <br /> <br />Cliff, I addressed this lot with a memo to Gerry Smith. At this point it <br />would not have to be addressed if your not digging into the hill and if your <br />not creating or eliminating any vegetational growth. It really does not <br />have to be addressed. <br /> <br />Steve - The hill itself has trees and the natural vegetation that was there. <br /> <br />Cliff - Any place where we do not cut off the vegetational growth or create <br />a slope steeper than 4 to 1 we do not have to address those lots. <br /> <br />Steve - I you don't create an erosion problem, why address it. <br /> <br />Cliff - If you went in and took all the top soil off, then we would have to <br />address it. <br /> <br />Cliff - Is there any other questions? I think we hit most of the lots. <br />I've heard comments on stumps being buried. I think were going to address <br />those to. We have addressed Deerfield 3rd and 4th coming off of Baldwin <br />Street and the cul-de-sac. I have not had connect with Pam Corman as far as <br />the hi lIs on there, but that also has to be addressed. (the Woodwright <br />House) . <br /> <br />Gerry - I have not dealt with Pam Corman. All I did was go with the guy to <br />the door who did the dirt work, and she asked to see him about cutting the <br />hill down, and that is all I know. <br /> <br />Cliff - While I was sending the memos out, I've had brief conversations with <br />her. She was concerned with what took place on the hill, and that was about <br />it. <br /> <br />Gerry - The dirt man made some deal with her to cut that hill down. I did <br />not get involved in that. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.