My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-03-1991 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1990 - 1999
>
1991
>
09-03-1991 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:30 AM
Creation date
9/12/2005 3:30:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
9/3/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Page 18 <br /> <br />Gerry indicated yes. <br /> <br />Cliff - Were showing a retaining wall here, but with Lot 9 itself, he still <br />has 1 to 1 slopes on the sides, and he also having an erosion control <br />problem coming off his garage. <br /> <br />Gerry - I thing what were going to do there is put an erosion control <br />completely around that so that on the property line will have erosion <br />control on the property line. <br /> <br />George - Consisting of what? <br /> <br />Gerry - There will be a regular erosion control. <br /> <br />Cliff - What we have is steeper than 4 to 1 slope off those. How are we <br />going to address that? <br /> <br />Gerry - That is eventually going to be filled soon as we can scrounge up <br />some dirt somewhere. <br /> <br />Cliff - In other words Gerry you saying your going to fill this area so its <br />??? <br /> <br />Gerry - We've come up to the property line and then its pretty steep so what <br />were going to do is put silt fence on the property line until we fill that <br />in. <br /> <br />Cliff - When are going to be filling that lot in? <br /> <br />Gerry - As soon as we can get some dirt were going to start filling it in. <br />Were going to fill in Both Lot 9 and 6. Both of those will be filled in. <br /> <br />Cliff - What we have is still a problem. The reason why were addressing <br />this is because this is steeper than 4 to 1, and the same thing would apply <br />with these sides here and also Lot 10. <br /> <br />Steve - Shouldn't the plans be revised to reflect all that then. <br /> <br />Cliff - Yes - because its showing a proposed and that elevation shouldn't be <br />achieved to eliminate the 4 to 1 because of all this should be working <br />together. <br /> <br />George - This has been filled in twice already and the erosion that is <br />created is almost to the pad coming out of my service door, and it is <br />roughly 4 ft. wide, 6 ft. deep and the one on my southeast corner has got to <br />be 6 ft. wide and 8 ft. deep. I know that a silt fence is not going to <br />correct that. <br /> <br />Cliff - No it isn't. Part of the requirements is that we have to achieve <br />that so we don't have the erosion coming off there. Especially since we <br />have the 95% compaction for the house, which is great, but we don't have <br />anything there that is going to retain that soils for that compaction. What <br />he is saying that if were getting erosion like that we don't have any <br />footing depth there anymore as far as protection from frost. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.