Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />August 25, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />occupancy. Some of <br />handicap accessibility, <br />number. <br /> <br />the changes required by the code would include <br />bathrooms and a State certified inspection <br /> <br />Larry Toth, trustee for the Church of St Andrew, stated that the church <br />is requesting a 5 year extension because it would take at least that <br />long to scale down their class sizes. He stated that the church is not <br />prepared at this late date to make new arrangements for the children <br />which would be displaced if these classrooms were not allowed to remain. <br /> <br />Chairman Nadeau opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Gary Keifenheim, who serves on the education committee for the <br />of St Andrew, stated that it would be a severe hardship for the <br />if these temporary classrooms had to be removed immediately. He <br />that the minimum time that the church would need is one year in <br />to plan what to do with the additional students. <br /> <br />Church <br />church <br />stated <br />order <br /> <br />There being no further comments, Chairman Nadeau closed the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson questioned how the State defines "temporary"? <br /> <br />Ms. Szklarski stated that according to <br />buildings are treated that as if they <br />are no 'special codes for temporary "E" <br /> <br />the State, all "E" occupancy <br />were permanent structures. There <br />occupancy buildings. <br /> <br />Chairman Nadeau questioned whether the Church could bring the temporary <br />structures up to code? <br /> <br />Larry Toth answered that he felt that most of these items could be met <br />with the exception of the bathrooms. Mr. Toth was unsure whether each <br />individual classroom had to have a bathroom within the facility or if <br />the facilities could be connected to the building. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanValkenburg questioned whether a conditional use permit <br />would still be required if the classrooms were brought up to code. <br /> <br />Ms. Szklarski answered that the building code is separate from the <br />zoning ordinance and the conditional use permit would still need to be <br />extended. <br /> <br />Peter Beck, City Attorney, stated <br />Council can not grant exceptions <br />conditional use permit process <br />safety issues. <br /> <br />that the Planning Commission and City <br />to the building code through the <br />as these codes deal with health and <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson stated that she would like to see the conditional <br />use permit renewed for one year with the condition that the classrooms <br />be brought up to code compliance as deemed acceptable by City Staff. <br /> <br />Chairman Nadeau stated that he felt one year would be an appropriate <br />compromise. <br />