Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />March 31, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />other Business <br /> <br />The Planning Commission discussed the following items under other <br />business: <br /> <br />The Planning Commission Work Goals <br /> <br />Mr. Rohlf indicated that the City Council would like the Planning <br />Commission to review the sign ordinance regarding whether or not <br />signage should be based on the size of the building. Specifically <br />whether large commerical and industrial buildings should have greater <br />latitude with the size of their freestanding and wall signage. The <br />Planning Commission agreed to add this to their work plan. <br /> <br />Discussion was held regarding what role the Planning Commission would <br />have with revisiting the downtown development Plan. It was the <br />consensus of the Planning Commission they should work with the downtown <br />redevelopment group, if that group desired them to. The Planning <br />Commission further requested that Mr. Rohlf provided them with the <br />Governor's Design Team information to aid them in their review. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER MINTON MOVED TO APPROVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION WORK <br />AS REVISED. COMMISSIONER VANVALKENBURG SECONDED THE MOTION. <br />MOTION PASSED 6-0. <br /> <br />PLAN <br />THE <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />Adjournment <br /> <br />There being no further business, COMMISSIONER EBERLEY MOVED <br />THE MEETING. COMMISSIONER MINTON SECONDED THE MOTION. <br />CARRIED 6-0. <br /> <br />TO ADJOURN <br />THE MOTION <br /> <br />The meeting of the Elk River Planning Commission adjourned at approximately <br />10:00 p.m. <br /> <br />~"Y submitted, <br /> <br />~1(rU/ <br /> <br />Stephen Rohlf .-, <br />B&Z Administrator <br />