My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.4. SR 09-12-2005
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2005
>
09/12/2005
>
5.4. SR 09-12-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:30 AM
Creation date
9/9/2005 2:25:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Item 5.4. <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />Pat Klaers, City Admi~,~t~~ ". . // <br />VM r""Y:<Je/Za <br />September 12, 2005 / <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />2006 Budget <br /> <br />The City Council reviewed parts of the 2006 draft budget at the August 8, 2005 worksession. At a <br />special City Council worksession on August 22, 2005, a very good discussion took place regarding <br />the capital outlay part of the 2006 draft budget. At this special meeting, staff received some City <br />Council direction as how to proceed in order to balance the draft 2006 budget. <br /> <br />The 2006 draft budget started with a significant budget gap when comparing requested expenditures <br />to proposed revenues. This budget gap was in part a result of putting all of the equipment and <br />vehicle capital outlay items into the general fund budget. (This is a financial goal the city hopes to <br />achieve within the next few years.) Another reason why there was a significant budget gap in the <br />draft 2006 budget was due to a conservative estimate in the expected increase in the city net tax <br />capacity (NTC). It should be noted that staff prepared the budget based on the assumption that the <br />City Council desired to see no change in the status in the city tax rate of 43.78%. <br /> <br />Attached is a budget outline that shows one way to balance the draft 2006 budget. This outline <br />includes some explanation notes and comments. There are other ways to balance the draft 2006 <br />budget but this approach seems to be reasonable and one that is consistent with feedback that was <br />received from the City on 8-22-05. <br /> <br />One of the biggest changes since the August 22, 2005 meeting is the NTC increase. County <br />information has been received and next year the increase is expected to be 15.737%. As discussed on <br />8-22-05, this rather large increase in the city NTC for 2006 results in additional tax revenues being <br />available for general fund expenditures without a change in the city tax rate. <br /> <br />The attached resolution authorizing the property tax levy for collection in 2006 shows a total of <br />$8,823,793. This is a 15.737% increase over the adopted 2005 tax levy resolution. (The general fund <br />tax revenues are proposed in the ~mount of $7,220,500. This is a $1,222,700 or 20.39% increase <br />from the adopted 2005 budget.) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.