08-23-1994 PC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 August 23. t994 ih ----~~~=~-n.--:::::12th Avenue. inquired about the conditional u~~1JJftJf!lJJ process, Le., if conditions are not met who can the residents contact, what l!!J actions are taken after notification/complaints, what is the time frame for the "complaint" process, can this permit be revoked, etc. Steve Rohlf responded. Mr. Whalen stated he is opposed to this proposal. Vicki Radloff, 12781 Watson Street, asked staff to clarify the conditional use permit process and further group meetings with Shiely Company. Commissioner Kreger responded. Peter Beck responded regarding a conditional use permit, a license, and revocation procedures. Charles Blood, 12263 Ridgewood Drive, questioned who would be monitoring wells during the excavation and asked about the tree line on the south of Shiely's property. Mr. Bieraugel responded. Mr. Rohlf commented that approximately fifty (50) acres of land is proposed to be donated by Shiely Company to the City. Mr. Blood also questioned staff that if a well problem did occur, who is responsible for costs incurred? Mr. Rohlf responded and referred to staff's report. John Kuester, 19234 York Street, thanked Shiely Company and staff for all the information received and knowledge gained from the neighborhood meetings. Mr. Kuester stated that he felt confident enough checks and balances were in place to ensure safety and consideration of area residents. . Rosalind Hoglund, 12846-206th Avenue, stated that she was also involved in the neighborhood meetings with Shiely Company and iterated Mr. Kuester's comments. Jim Lundquist, 21244 Vernon Street, asked Shiely Company if this would be a block plant or a cement plant, and if one was any quieter than the other. Mr. Bieraugel responded. Mr. Lundquist also wanted to know the estimated tax revenue for the City. Chairman Tveite responded stating the City Council hearing would be where information regarding the economics of this issue would be discussed. Mark Bay, 20779 York Street, asked staff if traffic associated with this proposal could be regulated/restricted. Mr. Rohlf responded. Mr. Bay also asked about future plans for the property north of County Road No. 33. Mr. Bieraugel responded. Steve Griffiths, 20760 York Street, asked the Commission about taxes generated from this use. Chairman Tveite responded. Jenny Dahmen, 12662 Ranch Road, questioned staff if County Road No. 33 could be widened. Mr. Rohlf responded. Tim Bykowski, 12767-210th Circle, iterated traffic and safety concerns on County Road No. 33. Mr. Bykowski also mentioned upgrading the railroad bed for trail purposes. Dave Anderson responded stating the Park & Recreation Board has applied for a grant to do so. .