My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-23-1995 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1990 - 1999
>
1995
>
05-23-1995 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:29 AM
Creation date
9/9/2005 10:55:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
5/23/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br />May 23, 1995 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. A ttempt to eliminate any type of grading in the backyards <br />. Minimize the drainage into wetland areas <br /> <br />Mr. Bastyr stated that he was willing to work with staff to consider the elimination <br />of any lots in order to preserve trees. <br /> <br />Discussion followed regarding enhancing the southern entrance to the plat. <br />Options for the use of Outlot A were also discussed. Commissioner Kreger <br />expressed concern that Outlot A be under City control and available to the <br />public. Chair Kuester commented that Dave Anderson, Park and Recreation <br />Commission Chair, felt that if Outlot A is protected under some sort of land <br />conservation and results in a tax benefit to the developer, perhaps some type of <br />park dedication fee could be required. <br /> <br />Commissioner Minton stated that he would be in favor of an access from the <br />northern streets to the northern trail. <br /> <br />Chair Kuester opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Robert Elveru, 19623 Proctor Avenue NW, expressed his concern that there be <br />sidewalks along the main thoroughfares in the development for children walking <br />to school. He also was concerned about increased traffic on Proctor. Mr. Elveru <br />questioned how water pressure would be maintained in the development due <br />to the high elevation. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mike Dwyer, 19623 Proctor Avenue NW, stated that he owns a lot on the <br />northeast corner of the proposed development. He explained that his lot was <br />included in the proposed extension of the urban service boundary and <br />questioned the impact this would have on his property. He further questioned if <br />there are any plans for the 40 acres southeast of the proposed development. <br />He also questioned how a park could be developed with the steep grade of <br />Outlot A. Finally, he questioned how the area would be serviced by City water. <br /> <br />Beverly Putnam, 19571 Proctor Avenue NW, stated that her home is located <br />directly across from the proposed entrance to the development. She expressed <br />concern regarding the increased traffic on Proctor, speeding and trucks <br />traveling on Proctor. <br /> <br />Jim Hamilton, 19711 Rush street, Ridgewood Addition, expressed his concern with <br />the density of the proposed development. He felt it would have a detrimental <br />impact on his property value. <br /> <br />Bob Elveru, 19623 Proctor Avenue, also expressed his concern for the density of <br />the proposed development, and the affect this many families would have on <br />the traffic problems they are already experiencing. <br /> <br />John Boggart, representing the developer, explained that given the proposed <br />100 foot buffer zone, there would be approximately 150 feet between Mr. <br />Hamilton's rear lot line and a potential neighbor's home to the south. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.