My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-24-1995 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1990 - 1999
>
1995
>
01-24-1995 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:28 AM
Creation date
9/9/2005 10:53:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
1/24/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />January 24, 1995 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />LITERAL APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE WILL NOT <br />DEPRIVE THE PETITIONER OF SUBSTANTIAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, AS HE IS STILL <br />ALLOWED TO BUILD 2,000 SQ. FT. FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. <br /> <br />2. OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS IN THIS AREA ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE SAME <br />REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, THEREFORE, THE SITUATION IS <br />NOT UNIQUE TO MR. LEFEBVRE'S PROPERTY. THERE ARE NO SPECIAL <br />CONDITIONS OR CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH ARE PECULIAR TO THE LAND OR <br />STRUCTURE CAUSING THE NEED FOR A VARIANCE. <br /> <br />3. THE 2,000 SQ. FT. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AREA STANDARD WAS DEVELOPED <br />FOR THE R1A ZONING DISTRICT WHERE THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE IS 2-1/2 <br />ACRES. MR. LEFEBVRE'S PARCEL IS A NONCONFORMING LOT IN THAT IT <br />ONLY HAS ONE ACRE, YET HE IS STILL ALLOWED TO BUILD TO THE SAME <br />STANDARD AS THE LARGER LOTS IN THAT DISTRICT. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER SULLIVAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0. <br /> <br />5.4. <br /> <br />GbnsidefKoohConHitlonall..lsepermifRegUeSf!publlCPlearirkrCaseNo.CU9W.39 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Staff report by Gary Schmitz. Charlotte Koon has requested a conditional use <br />permit to operate a therapeutic massage business from the Martin Plaza building <br />located at 934 Highway 10 (north of Highway 10 and east of Proctor Avenue). The <br />property is currently zoned C3 (Highway Commercial). Ms. Koon will be obtaining <br />a therapeutic massage license from the City, as required by City ordinance. The <br />license process involves a background check and is renewed on a yearly basis. <br />The business will be located in the basement of the Martin Plaza building. The <br />applicant has stated she will be providing full body massages and seated chair <br />massages on Tuesdays, Thursdays, Fridays and Saturdays. There will be a minimal <br />amount of traffic generated from the business, as the appointments will last from <br />1/2 to 1-1/2 hours, with 1/2 hour allowed for changing time. The applicant will be <br />licensed by the State of Minnesota in February, 1995. <br /> <br />Gary Schmitz stated that the Martin Plaza site currently has a Class 5 parking lot <br />and does not meet requirements for other site plan issues such as landscaping. <br />He stated that staff feels the proposed use is relatively small and it would not be <br />necessary to require hard-surfacing the parking lot or meet specific site plan <br />requirements at this time. He noted that building health and safety issues would <br />need to be addressed, such as electrical inspections, handicapped accessibility, <br />and septic problems. Gary stated that staff recommends approval of the request <br />with the condition that the massage license be granted by the City, and also, <br />that outstanding building code issues be addressed prior to operating the <br />business. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Kreger opened the public hearing. There being no comments from <br />the public, Vice Chair Kreger closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Gary Schmitz explained that the building code issues would need to be <br />addressed in order for the building official to sign off on the State license. <br />Commissioner Minton stated that he was not in favor of attaching the building <br />code issues to the conditional use permit, since it was a requirement of the State <br />license. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.