Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />February 27, 1996 <br /> <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />in the residential areas. Steve explained that this includes the out buildings, in <br />addition to the single family home itself. <br /> <br />Chair Dillon opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Darrell Klaus, 18434 Cleveland Street, questioned the benefit of limiting property <br />owners from subdividing their land into less than 10 acres. Steve Ach explained <br />that it would be difficult to extend utilities if the minimum lot size remained 2-1/2 <br />acres. Mr. Klaus stated he was considering subdividing his property into 2-1/2 <br />acre lots and would not be able to do so now. <br /> <br />There being no other comments from the public, Chair Dillon closed the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER THOMPSON MOVED THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND <br />APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 96-_, AMENDING THE SCHEDULE OF <br />DIMENSIONAL REGULATIONS, PUBLIC HEARING CASE NO. OA 96-1. <br />COMMISSIONER SULLIVAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Staff report by Scott Harlicker. The City of Elk River is initiating this rezoning so <br />that the zoning will be consistent with the land use designation of MR (Medium <br />Density Residential). The properties under consideration total approximately <br />1000 acres, located in an area bounded by County Road No. 13 to the north, <br />County Road No. 12 to the south, Cleveland Street on the east and Tyler Street <br />on the west. The surrounding land uses consist mainly of vacant land, farmland <br />and homesteads, and scattered single family residences. Staff recommends <br />approval of the rezoning based on the findings listed in the report to the <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Chair Dillon opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Mark Parranto, Delta Development, also representing Mr. Weldon Schulz, <br />explained they are interested in developing Mr. Schulz's property as a residential <br />PUD as soon as water and sewer becomes available. Mr. Parranto expressed his <br />opposition to the rezoning request, as well as Mr. Schultz's opposition. He also <br />expressed their opposition to the proposed industrial rezoning for a portion of Mr. <br />Schultz's property. <br /> <br />Carol Turner, 18776 Cleveland, asked for clarification on how this rezoning will <br />affect their property. Scott explained the rezoning would not allow them to <br />subdivide their property into lot sizes less than 10 acres, until water and sewer is <br />available. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Darrell Klaus, 18434 Cleveland, asked if the rezoning will devalue their property. <br />Peter Beck explained that generally, smaller minimum lot sizes will increase the <br />value of property, since more lots can be created from a parcel of property. <br />Peter Beck further explained how the urban service district was determined. Mr. <br />Klaus asked when sewer and water will be extended and how he would be <br />