09-24-1996 PC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . Planning Commission Minutes September 24, 1996 Page 2 SLY. .........................--....,-..........""""..............--------.--..---......--------.---.---.----..----..........""."...........""'.."'..........,..... ... .<....Plonhiha...Commissiot1ReSresent8fH,ie..to..Aftehd...lfJ/21f96...CItv..c8UhCiltVteefiho..... Commissioner Thompson will attend the September 16, 1996 City Council meeting. Staff report by Scott Harlicker. OJ's is requesting a conditional use permit for a second principle structure to be used as a storage building and variances for the following: 1. To allow pavement within 10 feet of the east and west property lines 2. Temporary bituminous curbing 3. No curbing in the rear of the existing building 4. The exterior of the proposed storage building to be painted metal Scott explained this item was tabled by the Planning Commission on July 23, 1996, with a request for further information. He noted the site plan being presented is essentially the same site plan that was presented to the Planning Commission at the July meeting, with the addition of the grading and drainage plan. Staff has made the following recommendations subject to the findings and conditions as outlined in the staff report to the Planning Commission: . Approval of the 5 foot variance to allow pavement within 5 feet of the property line along the north side of the existing building . Recommends denial of the other variance requests . Recommends approval of the conditional use permit Scott explained OJ's request may be affected by a rezoning which will be before the City Council at the October 21, 1996, meeting. If the property is rezoned to light industrial, the applicant would only be required to use materials from the approved list for 25% of the building exterior, rather than 75% as required by the current zoning. Also, the applicant would not be required to provide concrete curb and gutter from the rear of the building back, but the Planning Commission may require bituminous curbing to control runoff. Scott reviewed issues relating to parking and access, landscaping, signage and storage, as explained in the staff memo. Donald Savitsky, applicant, expressed his willingness to comply with staff's recommendations, with the exception of the 5 foot driveway variance. He felt he needs the full width of the property as a drive aisle between the existing building an property line. Chair Thompson opened the public hearing. There being no comments from the public, Chair Thompson closed the public hearing.