My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-23-1996 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1990 - 1999
>
1996
>
01-23-1996 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:28 AM
Creation date
9/9/2005 10:04:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
1/23/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />January 23, 1996 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Chair Dillon withdrew from discussion on items 5.6. and 5.7. to a conflict of <br />interest. <br /> <br />Staff report by Scott Harlicker. The City of Elk River is initiating this rezoning from <br />R4 (Multi-Family Residential) to R2 (Two Family Residential) in order to be <br />consistent with the recent changes in land use designations made by the City <br />Council. The properties under consideration for rezoning area located on the <br />east side of Jackson A venue, approximately 150 feet, from School Street south to <br />5th Street. <br /> <br />Vice-Chair Thompson opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Robert Bischoff, 602 Jackson Avenue, asked for clarification on uses allowed in <br />the current zoning and proposed zoning designations. He questioned why the <br />change was initiated. Commissioner Minton explained the uses allowed. <br />Commissioner Minton also explained there are three reasons for the zone <br />change; (1) the proposed change is a result of the review and update of the <br />Comprehensive Plan, (2) it reflects the existing uses, and (3) the school district'S <br />concern that any additional apartment buildings in this area will only add to the <br />existing problems they are experiencing with the high density. Mr. Bischoff <br />expressed his opposition to the zone change because he felt it interferes with his <br />right to use his property as he wishes. The Planning Commission discussed with <br />Mr. Bischoff the fact that his property would not accommodate an R4 use due <br />to its small size. <br /> <br />Sara Mae Moos, 836 Jackson Avenue, asked for clarification on whether or not <br />she would be able to rebuild her home if it were destroyed. She asked why her <br />neighbor, Dale Elliott, was not notified of the zone change. Steve explained <br />that the County tax records were used to obtain the names and addresses of <br />affected property owners. <br /> <br />There being no further comments from the public, Vice-Chair Thompson closed <br />the public hearing. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER MINTON MOVED THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND <br />APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE CITY OF ELK RIVER TO REZONE THE SUBJECT <br />PROPERTY FROM R4 (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO R2 (TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL), <br />PUBLIC HEARING CASE NO. ZC 96-1, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING: <br /> <br />1. THE PROPOSED REZONING WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE <br />LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION OF MR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL). <br /> <br />2. THE PROPOSED REZONING IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT LAND USES <br />AND ZONING. <br /> <br />3. THE PROPOSED REZONING WILL ALSO SERVE AS A LOGICAL LAND USE <br />TRANSITION BETWEEN THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES ON IRVING AVENUE <br />AND THE C2 ZONE ON THE WEST SIDE OF JACKSON AVENUE. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />THE EXISTING HOMES WOULD NOT BECOME NON-CONFORMING USES IN <br />THE PROPOSED R2 ZONE. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.