Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting Notes <br />June 14, 2005 Page 2 <br />--------------------- <br /> <br /> Commissioner Lemke stated that he liked SD6, but that there should be more office space <br />and that he would like to this be a place that people reverse commute to, versus commuting <br />to Minneapolis. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Offerman stated that he liked the transportation access points. <br /> <br /> Ms. Graham asked if we had obtained the tax and assessing information requested at the last <br />meeting. Director Planning McPherson noted that we have not been able to contact the <br />Assessor, but that information would be available for the July meeting. <br /> <br /> Mr. Izati stated that he would like to see high quality townhomes. Mr. Brenan asked if we <br />were under a mandate for affordable housing. He stated he would prefer high-end <br />townhomes, condominiums, or apartments. <br /> <br />3. Turner Concept Plan <br /> <br /> The Commission reviewed the preliminary concept plan for 75 lots on 40 acres owned by <br />Ms. Turner that is being developed by Meridian Development Company. Director of <br />Planning McPherson reviewed the site constraints and the connections to River Park. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevens asked if there would be an access to County Road 40. He felt one <br />was desirable and a connection to the southwest should also be included. He asked what the <br />tradeoff for the increased density to the City would be. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Lemke asked what the distance would be between access points on County <br />Road 40. Ms. McPherson noted that they would be approximately 1,300 feet. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Offerman concurred that a connection to the property to the south or to <br />County Road 40 was needed. Commissioner Stevens questioned the level of density and <br />whether it was consistent with the adjacent developments. Commissioner Anderson noted <br />that he needed to understand the benefit to the City for the smaller lots. <br /> <br />4. Discuss Maxim Furniture Building Materials <br /> <br /> Tom Ryan, Ryan Development and Dave Anderson of FabCon were present to review the <br />proposed material change for Maxim Furniture. They explained the technical differences <br />and execution in creating the proposed panel for the furniture building and noted that the <br />ribbed panel that was initially proposed would not be well executed, based on the factory’s <br />abilities. They displayed samples of the proposed corduroy pattern and it was the consensus <br />of the Commission to approve the use of the integrally colored exposed aggregate random <br />pattern corduroy with the stamped lower portion as proposed by Ryan Development. <br /> <br />5. Discuss 2005 – 2008 Goals and Objectives <br /> <br /> The Commission had no changes to the goals and objectives as presented, but wanted <br />additional projects added to the workshop schedule prepared by staff. These items will be <br />added to the regular agenda for June for formal approval and forwarding to the City Council. <br /> <br /> <br />