08-09-2005 PC MIN - SPECIAL - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Special Planning Commission Minutes Page 10 August 9, 2005 --------------------------- Commissioner Lemke asked for clarification as to why the City initially did not want the fabric structures. Ms. McPherson stated that it was mostly a matter of aesthetics. Commissioner Westgaard stated that he was not opposed to the structures. He stated he could foresee a company such as Cretex asking for one. He stated that if they are allowed for governmental use, why not the general public to use them as accessory buildings in the I1 and I2 Districts. Ms. McPherson stated that if fabric structures were allowed for accessory buildings, the principal structure would still need to meet the City’s standards of the I1 and I2 Districts. Commissioner Westgaard asked if accessory structures are allowed to exceed the size of the principal structure, and what is the size of the structure proposed by the Street Department. Ms. McPherson stated that there is nothing in the ordinance stating that an accessory building cannot be larger than the principal building. She stated that the structure will be 8,000 square feet. Mr. Hals noted that the existing principal building on the site is 18,000 square feet. Chair Anderson suggested that the ordinance amendment restrict the use to government uses, and an ordinance amendment could be processed if another type of user made a request. Ms. McPherson stated that if the structures were allowed by conditional use permit, the Commission would review each request independently, regarding issues such as screening. Mr. Thompson stated that a standard would be set by salt/sand storage facility, since it would be located well away from the street and would be screened by existing and future buildings. Commissioner Offerman stated he would prefer to see a fabric structure, versus an open storage yard. Commissioner Lemke asked if the fabric structure would be taller than the one shown on the photos. Mr. Hals stated, no. He stated the one shown is more functional and would allow them to maneuver trucks within more easily than a taller structure. Mr. Hals noted that the MPCA now requires loading of the salt/sand materials inside a building. Commissioner Lemke stated he would support drafting of the ordinance amendment. 6. Discuss Planning Commission Applicant Interview Questions Ms. McPherson explained that the City Council has expressed interest in interviewing all candidates for appointment to the Planning Commission, including Commissioners wishing to serve an additional term. She asked that the Commissioners review the sample questions and respond to her with any revisions or additional questions by August 31. st 7.Other Business Ms. McPherson noted that a joint meeting of all of the City’s Commissions and City Council has been scheduled for October 10, 2005. More information will be provided at a later date.