Laserfiche WebLink
Legal Requirements for Remote City Meetings <br />By Kyle Hartnett <br />Although the governor’s state of emergency for COVID-19 has ended, some city councils — and their residents <br />— have become so comfortable with the convenience of online meetings that they want to continue them. <br />Continuing remote meetings, however, requires cities to follow specific statutory procedures, depending on how <br />technology is being used. <br />Interactive technology <br />Typically, under the Minnesota Open Meeting Law, city officials can only vote at a city meeting if they are <br />physically present. If a city official wants to take part in a meeting through interactive technology, the Open <br />Meeting Law requires them to take specific steps. The Open Meeting Law requirements for remote participation <br />are different from those many cities used while the governor’s COVID-19 emergency orders were in effect. <br />Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.02 defines the requirements for a city to meet using “interactive technology” <br />(formerly called “interactive television”). The law defines interactive technology as a device, software program, <br />or other application that allows individuals in different physical locations to see and hear one another. The law <br />will apply anytime a city council or board uses programs such as Zoom, WebEx, Microsoft Teams, etc. <br />The following requirements must be met for a city to meet via interactive technology: <br />• Members at all locations can hear and see one another and all discussion and testimony presented. <br />• The public at the regular meeting location can hear and see all discussion and testimony. <br />• At least one member of the council is present at the regular meeting location. <br />• All votes are conducted by roll call. <br />• Each location at which a member of the body is present is open and accessible to the public. <br />• The city provides notice of the regular meeting location and remote locations. <br />• To the extent practical, the public can monitor the meeting electronically from a remote location. <br />Notice of location does not need to be provided if a member is serving in the military and is at a required drill, <br />deployed, or on active duty. <br />Concerns <br />One of the biggest concerns with using interactive technology is that members participating remotely must do <br />so from a location that is open to the public. This means that if a member is taking part in a meeting from their <br />home, the member must provide their address in the public notice and allow the public to attend the meeting <br />from the home. <br />While it is unlikely that a member of the public would want to watch a meeting from a council member’s home <br />or hotel room, council members must be prepared for such a possibility. <br />Another concern with relying on interactive technology is the possibility that technology will not work as <br />planned. If, for example, a city has connectivity issues during an interactive meeting, it may not be able to allow <br />remote participants to attend.