My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-22-2005 CC MIN - SPECIAL
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
08-22-2005 CC MIN - SPECIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:27 AM
Creation date
9/7/2005 12:55:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
8/22/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL <br />HELD AT THE ELK RIVER CITY HALL <br />(UPPER TOWN CONFERENCE ROOM) <br />MONDAY, AUGUST 22, 2005 <br /> <br /> <br />Members Present: Mayor Klinzing, Councilmembers Dietz, Farber, Gumphrey, and Motin <br /> <br />Members Absent: None <br /> <br />Staff Present: City Administrator Pat Klaers, Finance and Administrative Services <br />Director Lori Johnson, Parks and Recreation Director Bill Maertz, Police <br />Chief Jeff Beahen, Fire Chief Bruce West, Street Superintendent Phil Hals, <br />and Assistant Street Superintendent Mark Thompson <br /> <br /> <br />1. Call Meeting To Order <br /> <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the special meeting of the Elk River City Council <br />was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Klinzing. <br /> <br />2. Budget Worksession <br /> <br /> The city administrator provided an overview of the draft 2006 budget. At this time the draft <br />budget shows a gap between proposed revenues ($10,033,200) and requested expenditures <br />($11,189,250) in the amount of $1,156,050. It was noted that the proposed maximum tax <br />levy for the city needs to be certified to the county by September 15, 2005. <br /> <br />The city administrator stated that staff worked on the budget with the assumption that the <br />Council wanted no change in the tax rate. He stated that the general fund budget includes <br />additional tax revenues based on a 10% increase in the city Net Tax Capacity (NTC). Mr. <br />Klaers further stated that the budget gap could decrease significantly if the city NTC <br />increased more than 10%. He noted that if the NTC went up 14% instead of the 10% that is <br />in the draft budget, then an additional $304,950 could be raised without any change in the <br />city tax rate and these monies could be used to help balance the budget. Information on the <br />city NTC increase is not yet available and that this information is provided by Sherburne <br />County. The NTC information from the county is expected around Labor Day. <br /> <br /> The city administrator stated that a budget goal is to increase the capital outlay expenditures <br />within the general fund; but that capital outlay is a major factor in the 2006 budget gap. <br />Capital outlays in the amount of $900,850 is in the general fund budget. By reducing this <br />amount to $250,000 the budget gap can be reduced by $650,850. This capital outlay amount <br />of $650,850 will either have to be funded with equipment certificates or equipment reserves <br />or else the expenditure will have to be cut from the budget and not funded in 2006. <br /> <br /> The city administrator suggested that in order to help balance the budget, the fire truck <br />payment of $85,456 can be funded with reserves and the money identified in the preliminary <br />levy sample for this payment can then be put into the general fund as tax revenues. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Farber asked for an explanation regarding the status of the Street <br />Department trucks and indicated his belief was the city could only afford to do one truck <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.