My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.10 SR 12-20-2021
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2021 - 2030
>
2021
>
12-20-2021
>
4.10 SR 12-20-2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2021 2:57:52 PM
Creation date
12/16/2021 2:54:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/20/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />12. If my city or county signs onto the MN MOA, does that mean it automatically signs <br />onto the Settlements with the Distributors or J&J? <br />No. A city or county that signs the MN MOA is agreeing to a framework for how <br />settlement funds will flow in the event the Settlements become effective. However, the <br />city or county must separately sign on to the Settlements in order to receive payments <br />pursuant to the MN MOA. <br /> <br />13. If my city or county joins the Settlements, will we receive direct payments? <br /> <br />It depends. All counties that join are set to receive direct allocation under the terms of the <br />MN MOA, as well as all cities that join and meet the following eligibility criteria: <br /> <br />Have a population of 30,000 or more, based on the U.S. Census BureauÓs Vintage <br />2019 population totals; <br />Have funded or otherwise managed an established health care or treatment <br />infrastructure (e.g., health department or similar agency); or <br />Have initiated litigation against the Distributors or J&J as of December 3, 2021. <br />The population threshold for non-litigating cities to receive a direct allocation of funds <br />recognizes that the efficient delivery of opioid abatement services is hindered if the funds <br />are divided into hundreds of small allocations. Even with potentially upwards of $300 <br />million coming into Minnesota, allocating funds among several hundred smaller cities and <br />towns would result in minimal payments for most subdivisions, in many cases less than a <br />few dollars a year. For that same reason, under the MN MOA cities allocated a share may <br />elect to have their full share or a portion of their share instead directed to the county in <br />which the city is located. <br /> <br />Although not all cities will receive a direct allocation of opioid abatement funds, those <br />cities will still benefit from the opioid remediation efforts that take place in their <br />communities. Moreover, under the MN MOA, each county receiving opioid settlement <br />funds must consult annually with the cities in the county regarding use of the settlement <br />funds. Finally, cities that are not eligible for a direct share may also request grants for <br />opioid remediation programs from the stateÓs opioid remediation fund, which are <br />distributed via the Opioid Epidemic Response Advisory Council and the Department of <br />Human Services. <br /> <br />14. If my city or county joins, how much money will we receive? <br /> <br />Under the terms of the MN MOA, local governments (including cities and counties) that <br />join the Settlements will directly receive 75% of the total abatement funds, divided among <br />the counties and eligible cities in the percentages reflected in Exhibit B to the MN MOA. <br />The percentages reflected in Exhibit B are based upon the MDLÓs Opioid Negotiation Class <br />Model. Experts and attorneys representing local governments in the MDL developed the <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.