My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.5. SR 10-04-2021
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2021 - 2030
>
2021
>
10-04-2021
>
4.5. SR 10-04-2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2021 9:18:33 AM
Creation date
10/1/2021 8:41:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
10/4/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PROPOSAL PREPARED ESPECIALLY FOR CITY OF ELK RIVER, MINNESOTA <br />PEER REVIEW <br />LANDMARK <br />CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNMANTS <br />Report on the Firm's System of Quality Control <br />March 12, 2021 <br />To the Partners of BerganKDV, LLC <br />and the Peer Review Committee of the Minnesota Society of CPAs. <br />We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of BerganKDV, LLC <br />(the firm) in effect for the year ended March 31, 2020. Our peer review was conducted in accordance with <br />the Standards for Performing and Reporting on Peer Reviews established by the Peer Review Board of the <br />American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (Standards). <br />A summary of the nature, objectives, scope, limitation of, and the procedures performed in a System Review <br />as described in the Standards may be found at www.aicoa.org/prsummary. The summary also includes an <br />explanation of how engagements identified as not performed or reported in conformity with applicable <br />professional standards, if any, are evaluated by a peer reviewer to determine a peer review rating. <br />Firm's Responsibility <br />The firm is responsible for designing a system of quality control and complying with it to provide the firm <br />with reasonable assurance of performing and reporting in conformity with applicable professional <br />standards in all material respects. The firm is also responsible for evaluating actions to promptly remediate <br />engagements deemed as not performed or reported in conformity with professional standards, when <br />appropriate, and for remediating weaknesses in its system of quality control, if any. <br />Peer Reviewer's Responsibility <br />Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the design of the system of quality control and the firm's <br />compliance therewith based on our review. <br />Required Selections and Considerations <br />Engagements selected for review included an engagement performed under Government Auditing <br />Standards, including compliance under the Single Audit Act, and audits of employee benefit plans. <br />As a part of our peer review, we considered reviews by regulatory entities as communicated by the firm, if <br />applicable, in determining the nature and extent of our procedures. <br />Fort Smith I Little Rock I Rogers I Russellville I i_andmarkCPAs.com <br />Accounting. Consulting. in=_ights. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.