My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.1. PCSR 09-28-2021
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2021-2030
>
2021
>
09-28-2021
>
3.1. PCSR 09-28-2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2021 8:46:17 AM
Creation date
9/24/2021 8:46:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
9/28/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Page 8 <br /> August 24,2021 <br /> ----------------------------- <br /> Master Plan were specific to the side of the road the trail would be placed and <br /> wouldn't be prioritized as to which trails are done first. The trails would be added as <br /> roadways are improved and as developments go in. <br /> The commission reviewed Chapter 8—Infrastructure, and Commissioner Booth <br /> asked if residents were surveyed regarding broadband availability. <br /> Mr. Carlton explained the map put together by Sherburne County of areas where <br /> broadband is available and where there are service gaps. It was noted DEED also <br /> provided a database of broadband information for the plan. <br /> Chapter 8—Mr. Nolin indicated they are editing the section north of Highway 10 <br /> between the lake and the river and acknowledging „cutoff. <br /> It was the consensus of the commission to include the se\how <br /> hway 10 <br /> and the lake/river to acknowledge the cutoff. <br /> Commissioner Keisling asked about the park maintenancow those <br /> are managed. He felt the focus on building parks should iassets are <br /> maintained and perhaps some framework could be included. <br /> After some discussion,it was the consensus of the commission to add language on <br /> page 110 in the Focus Resources to maintain park assets to a high level;page 139, on <br /> the Implementation Action Matrix - maintain the current parks before adding <br /> additional. ...; ......;.; <br /> The commission discussed Chapter 9 Implementation Plan. <br /> Commissioner Rydberg discussed the importance of community communications;he <br /> also supported the negotiation process between staff and the developer prior to <br /> meeting with the commission and council level, and to support and encourage staff <br /> to allow them to have resources to make decisions before presenting and providing <br /> detailed information on how staff came to the final product. <br /> Chair Larson-Vito agreed but stated some of these communications are guided by <br /> state statute and going above and beyond can be problematic legally; she felt <br /> discussions with the city attorney could clarify those concerns. <br /> Mr. Carlton indicated the consistency in public hearing notice requirements and how <br /> the council notifies for each project consistently. <br /> Commissioner Keisling asked if the components are prioritized in the matrix and <br /> how those are taken into consideration. <br /> Commissioner Johnson stated things happen organically and didn't think there was a <br /> way to weigh each item,noting each committee or commission will review these <br /> items. He stated the council will direct staff and the commissions of what is a <br /> priority. <br /> P <br /> }� <br /> � agwEeEo er <br /> A AfURE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.