Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Adjustments Minutes Page 3 <br /> July 27,2021 <br /> ----------------------------- <br /> Chair Larson-Vito opened the public hearing. <br /> Ryan Dunagan, 14120 37"'Ave N., Plymouth,thanked the Board of Adjustments <br /> for hearing his request and explained the reasons for his request. He stated he was <br /> trying to keep his goal to build a house in as natural area as possible in a rural area <br /> and stay in compliance with the grading concerns and property characteristics. <br /> Commissioner Rydberg asked Mr. Dunagan if he approved of the conditions as <br /> presented. <br /> Mr. Dunagan stated they are running out of area to make their original plan work <br /> and were told their plan wouldn't be approved by the DNR. He stated their original <br /> plan was to build the house in the northern part of the property,but mainly their <br /> desire is to build a house in a rural area, so they will stay=in compliance with the <br /> conditions and setbacks as proposed. <br /> Commissioner Johnson asked if the applicant agreed with the con o'ns listed by <br /> the DNR, specifically if in the future they wanted to add a deck, they would need to <br /> stay within the setback. <br /> Mr. Dunagan stated they understood the parameters and changed the position of <br /> house to allow for the septic to have the least environmental impact. Given the <br /> grading characteristics and setbacks, he understands that the house will have to be <br /> 040440'W <br /> placed where it is. <br /> There being no one pres tit to speak, Chair Larson-Vito closed the public hearing. <br /> Moved by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commissioner Beise to <br /> approve the 75' lake setback variance for the following reasons: <br /> 1. The general purpose and intent of the ordinance are met. <br /> The property has a land use of residential and the use is consistent with <br /> the comprehensive plan. <br /> The proposed use is reasonable and is permitted in the zoning <br /> ordinance. <br /> 4. The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the <br /> property not a consequence of the petitioner's own action or inaction. <br /> 5. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br /> and with the following conditions: <br /> 1. Structures (principal or accessory) should be no further north than the <br /> structures on the parcel directly to the west, at the time of approval. <br /> 2. A 75-foot buffer from the Ordinary High Watermark (OHW) not <br /> allowing any impacts, such as structures, excavation, grading and <br /> removal of vegetation, to occur in the buffer. <br /> 3. The wetland variance includes grading and structures/driveways. <br /> p0WIn10 0 <br /> UREJ <br />