My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.2a ERMUSR 09-14-2021
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2014-2024
>
2021
>
09-14-2021
>
6.2a ERMUSR 09-14-2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2021 11:50:01 AM
Creation date
9/13/2021 11:50:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
9/14/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
saw their goal increased to 1.75%.) The first 0.95% must be from <br />conservation efforts, but the remaining 0.55% can come from a variety <br />of sources, including efficient fuel switching improvements. However, <br />until July 1, 2026, a COU may not spend more than 0.55% per year, <br />averaged over a three-year period, of the utility’s gross annual retail <br />energy sales, on efficient fuel switching improvements. <br /> <br />o Article 2, section 4, subd. 3 - provides for the transition to ECO plans, <br />the first of which must be filed by June 1, 2022. The plan can be up to <br />three years in duration. A COU opting to file a two or three-year plan <br />does not have to ensure that each year of the plan will see at least a <br />0.95% savings, but over the life of the plan must average savings of at <br />least 0.95%. Annual updates must be given on the status of each plan <br />beginning June 1, 2023. <br /> <br />This portion of ECO also authorizes a COU to seek a reduction in their <br />savings goal, but the Commerce Commissioner may not approve a <br />reduction below 0.95% on the conservation side of the goal. <br /> <br />o Article 2, section 4, subd. 4 imposes a penalty if a utility fails to meet <br />its savings goal for three consecutive years and has not spent an <br />average of at least 1.5% of its gross operating revenue during that <br />time for an electric utility and 0.05 percent gross operating revenue <br />for a gas utility. The penalty remains in effect until the utility’s savings <br />goal has been met for three consecutive years. The Commerce <br />Commissioner has some discretion to lower the penalty. This <br />provision replaces the minimum spending requirement that applied to <br />all utilities regardless of what it cost to meet their respective savings <br />goal. <br /> <br />o Article 2, section 4, subd. 5 - maintains a COU’s obligation to fund a <br />low-income program, but now allows some money to be spent on <br />“pre-winterization” efforts. IOUs will see a steady increase in low- <br />income spending, but this mandate does not apply to COUs. The <br />Commerce Commissioner was required to have by August 1, 2021, <br />convened a stakeholder group to establish updated guidelines for <br />determining eligibility of multifamily buildings to participate in <br />conservation programs offered to low-income households. Such a <br />group must meet at least once every five years. <br /> <br />o Article 2, section 4, subd. 8 – establishes criteria for measuring <br />efficient fuel switching improvements, including requirements that it: <br />results in a net reduction of source energy; results in a net reduction <br />of statewide greenhouse gas emissions; and is cost effective. <br /> <br />o Article 2, section 7 – establishes a stakeholders’ group, including <br />municipal utilities, to develop technical guidelines for efficient fuel- <br />5 <br /> <br />111 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.