Laserfiche WebLink
same request was made the prior year and legal counsel advised that a current <br />commission cannot obligate a future commission to a set wage increase. However, <br />the commission and the WBC committee both agree that the metro average is the <br />benchmark to strive for in awarding the wage adjustment for the lineworkers every <br />year. <br /> <br />Regarding the request to have the metro average as the standard wage adjustment <br />companywide, the four employee groups were discussed. These groups were <br />created strategically to allow for the appropriate wage adjustments to be applied to <br />the different market groups. The organization benchmarks the lineworker group <br />every year to remain competitive in a very competitive market. The other groups are <br />not as easy to benchmark, however, we need to do a better job of doing this on a <br />regular basis. The committee will work with HR to determine a way to do this <br />regularly, and present to employees what that timeframe is (annually, every two <br />years, every three years, etc.) so they know what to expect. <br /> <br />2. The second request to change the residency rule to be within 20 miles or 30 minutes <br />seems reasonable and there was very little discussion. As the original criteria for 20 <br />miles was that it shouldn’t be more than 30 minutes response time within that <br />radius, this would allow for some additional flexibility if more than 20 miles still can <br />be accomplished in 30 minutes. <br /> <br />The Committee proposes that the residency rule be changed to be within a twenty <br />(20) mile radius of the power plant, or within a 30-minute response time. <br /> <br />3. The third request for the Longevity Plan as a potential employer contribution to the <br />457 plan was researched for legality. Unfortunately, any employer contribution to <br />the 457 plan can only be a matched contribution by the employee, and so could not <br />be done as requested. The committee reviewed the previously submitted proposal <br />from July and revised the contribution amounts within the years of award. <br /> <br />The revised longevity plan proposed is below: <br /> 8 years $1,550 <br />12 years $2,025 <br />16 years $2,100 <br />20 years $2,125 <br />24 years $2,300 <br />28 years $3,000 <br />32 years $3,000 <br /> <br />4. The fourth request was to explore some options for having a summer hours <br />schedule for field staff. There was discussion on what the considerations and <br />challenges are in implementing a summer schedule. The most obvious challenge was <br />the current application of overtime in recording hours worked for the field staff. <br />They are currently paid overtime on any day where more than 8 hours are worked. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />82 <br />