My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-06-2021 Regular CCM
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
07-06-2021 Regular CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2021 9:18:12 AM
Creation date
7/20/2021 9:18:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
7/19/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes <br />July 6, 2021 <br />Township. <br />Page 7 <br />Mr. Leeseberg clarified Big Lake Township is not opposed to the frontage road <br />access if the yellow route is completed. He stated they don't want to see 85% of <br />traffic use that access but they do own right-of-way and future intent is for it to be a <br />service drive between Elk River and Big Lake along Highway 10. <br />Councilmember Beyer is not opposed to the project, but he would like to find a <br />solution for better traffic flow if the red and yellow routes are not built. He <br />questioned if one way in and out of the development was acceptable. <br />Councilmember Christiansen asked if there was a guide to define how much traffic a <br />one way in and out could handle. <br />Mr. Leeseberg stated it's not uncommon for cities to take advantage of opportunities <br />for land acquisition for future road extensions. He compared it to puzzle pieces and <br />cited examples where you'll see dead-end trails that appear to go nowhere, but there <br />is a long-term connection plan behind them. He further noted there are two access <br />points in and out of the development. He stated the other access points will get <br />developed but may not be ready now. <br />Council discussed conditions of the CUP. <br />Mayor Dietz stated there may be a way to finance the yellow route with tax <br />abatement. <br />Moved by Councilmember Westgaard and seconded by Councilmember <br />Wagner to approve Conditional Use Permit, CU 21-10 establishing the <br />Broadway on 10 residential planned unit development with the following <br />conditions to satisfy the standards set forth in Section 30-654: <br />1. A PUD agreement shall be approved by the City Council and signed by <br />both parties prior to the issuance of building permits for any building <br />within the project area. <br />2. The field road access to Highway 10 shall be removed and vacated in <br />accordance with MnDOT standards. <br />3. All comments noted in the staff comment letter dated May 7, 2021, shall be <br />addressed prior to sending the PUD agreement to the City Council for <br />approval. <br />4. Direct staff to immediately begin work on extension to the east (Waco). <br />(pursue not required) <br />Motion carried 3-2. Councilmember Christianson and Beyer opposed. <br />Moved by Councilmember Westgaard and seconded by Councilmember <br />Wagner to approve Preliminary Plat, P 21-05 Broadway on 10. Motion carried <br />IJ 3-2. Councilmember Christianson and Beyer opposed. <br />P O w E R E 0 6 1 <br />NATUREI <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.