Laserfiche WebLink
$0Transfer45% PIF TransferBudgeted TransfersOperating Income Park Improvement Funding$1,200,000$1,000,000$800,000$600,000$400,000$200,000$0$350,000$300,000$250,000$200,000$150,000$100,000$50,000 <br /> <br />201220132014201520162017201820192020 <br />Operating Income$916,354$1,049,821$1,048,469$1,029,210$945,652$921,015$969,455$1,066,993$1,023,296 <br />Budgeted Transfers$360,157$422,000$391,013$399,050$438,950$482,850$492,000$500,000$500,000 <br />45% PIF Transfer$250,289$282,519$290,668$265,617$228,016$197,174$214,855$255,147$235,483 <br /> Property/liability rates are expected to remain flat, but premiums are affected by other factors such as <br />property values, changes in expenditures, experience rating, and other exposure measures. <br /> <br />Changes in Net Tax Capacity <br />Early spring estimates from the county indicate residential market values increasing approximately 7% and <br />commercial/industrial values increasing about 1%, which should result in a NTC increase of roughly 6% or <br />about $1.7 million additional tax capacity. <br /> <br />The attached graphical illustrations show the trends in the general fund budget, tax levy, tax capacity, and tax <br />rate over the past ten years. Also attached for consideration this year is a schedule of the debt service levies <br />needed to fund the principal and interest payments on the city’s general obligation debt, which does not include <br />the YMCA, Sales Tax Revenue, or Sewer Revenue bonds. <br /> <br />Park Improvement Funding (PIF) <br />The PIF transfer from the Liquor Fund is calculated and made after the prior year’s audit is complete. The <br />funding policy was briefly discussed during a budget meeting last year for potential revision. <br /> <br />The PIF policy was adopted in 2008 and revised in 2012. The current policy states: The city may utilize up to 45% of <br />operating income less budgeted transfers from its municipal liquor stores to fund a Park Improvement Fund. The amount will be <br />calculated after the prior year’s audit is complete and will be subsequently transferred via resolution from the City Council. <br /> <br />When the policy was updated, the expected transfer amount was $250,000. In recent years, the transfer varied <br />and was significantly less than expected due to the calculation method outlined in the policy. The calculation is <br />no longer conducive to the PIF transfer and has been affected by required GASB audit adjustments to operating <br />income and fluctuations in budgeted transfers. This makes it difficult to properly plan park improvement <br />projects when the funding amount is unknown. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Based on the initial PIF funding expectations to provide stability and allow for the accumulation of resources, it <br />is proposed to revise the current Park Improvement Fund policy as follows: <br />