My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.1 SR 05-17-2021
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2021 - 2030
>
2021
>
05-17-2021
>
8.1 SR 05-17-2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2021 9:32:03 AM
Creation date
5/14/2021 11:07:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/17/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
commence construction in 2021. The applicant intends to commence construction of the second building <br />(Phase 2) shortly thereafter but has indicated construction could start 2-3 years after phase 1. <br /> <br />Applicant Request for Assistance <br />Stonewood Development, LLC has requested assistance that includes 90% of incremental revenues for 20 <br />years from each building phase as necessary for redevelopment of the project site. The applicant’s supporting <br />financial information includes updated sources and uses of funds with a revised total development cost of $34.7 <br />million with 80% as debt financing and 20% as private equity. Financial assistance through pay-as-you-go tax <br />increment financing from the City of Elk River has been requested to provide additional revenues to support the <br />required level of debt and project cash flow to repay annual debt service payments. Typical extraordinary <br />redevelopment costs that cannot be supported solely by the project alone could justify the need for public <br />financial assistance and allow the project to proceed as proposed to provide appropriate upfront funding and <br />meet the minimum debt coverage requirements. The applicant has indicated the receipt of City financial <br />assistance is necessary for the project to proceed. <br /> <br />The updated sources and uses of funds from the applicant’s financial materials is illustrated in the table below. <br /> <br />Sources Amount Uses Amount <br />First Mortgage $27,762,071 80% Acquisition $2,225,000 6% <br />Equity $6,940,518 20% Professional $1,368,591 4% <br /> General $2,842,024 8% <br /> Site Development $1,671,415 5% <br /> Construction $17,537,997 51% <br /> Concrete $4,347,650 13% <br /> Development Fee $1,499,634 4% <br /> Construction Management Fee $1,499,634 4% <br /> Contingency $1,710,645 5% <br />Total $34,702,589 100% Total $34,702,589 100% <br /> <br />Tax increment financing has been requested as pay-as-you-go and would not be an upfront funding source and <br />instead be used to support repayment of first mortgage debt service <br /> <br />TIF Eligible Expenses <br /> <br />Site Improvements/Preparation Costs Amount <br />Land acquisition $2,000,000 <br />Excavating/grading $860,887 <br />Concrete work $3,902,650 <br />Driveway $220,986 <br />Masonry/precast $445,000 <br />Landscaping $305,000 <br />Total $7,734,523 <br /> <br />Project Financing <br />There are generally two ways in which assistance can be provided for most projects, either upfront or on a pay- <br />as-you-go basis. With upfront financing, the City would finance a portion of the applicant’s initial project costs <br />through the issuance of bonds or as an internal loan. Future tax increment would be collected by the City and <br />used to pay debt service on the bonds or repayment of the internal loan. With pay-as-you-go financing, the <br />applicant would finance all project costs upfront and would be reimbursed over time for a portion of those costs <br />as revenues are available. <br /> <br />Pay-as-you-go-financing is generally more acceptable than upfront financing for the City because it shifts the <br />risk for repayment to the applicant. If tax increment revenues are less than originally projected, the applicant <br />receives less and therefore bears the risk of not being reimbursed the full amount of their financing. However, <br />in some cases pay as you go financing may not be financially feasible. With bonds, the City would still need to <br />make debt service payments and would have to use other sources to fill any shortfall of tax increment revenues. <br />With internal financing, the City reimburses the loan with future revenue collections and may risk not repaying <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.