My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.4 ERMUSR 05-11-2021
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2014-2024
>
2021
>
05-11-2021
>
5.4 ERMUSR 05-11-2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2021 12:10:09 PM
Creation date
5/12/2021 12:10:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
5/11/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />I. About this Report <br />This report focuses on distribution system reliability across the country and is customized <br />to each utility that participates in the American Public Power Association’s eReliability <br />Tracker service. APPA created the eReliability Tracker Annual Report to assist utilities in <br />their efforts to understand and analyze their electric system. In 2012, APPA developed the <br />eReliability Tracker thanks to a grant from the Demonstration of Energy & Efficiency <br />Developments (DEED) program. <br />This report reflects data in the eReliability Tracker from January 1, 2020 to December 31, <br />2020. If you do not have a full year of data in the system, then this analysis might not <br />properly reflect your utility's statistics. The report only includes data recorded as of <br />February 7, 2021. Reliability reflects both historic and ongoing engineering investment <br />decisions within a utility. Proper use of reliability metrics ensures that a utility is <br />performing its intended function and is providing service in a consistent and effective <br />manner. <br />While the primary use of reliability statistics is for self-evaluation, you can use these <br />statistics to compare your utility with similar utilities. However, differences such as <br />electrical network configuration, ambient environment, weather conditions, and number <br />of customers served typically limit most utility-to-utility comparisons. Due to the diverse <br />range of utilities that use the eReliability Tracker, this report endeavors to improve <br />comparative analyses by grouping utilities by size and region. <br />Since this report contains data for all utilities that use the eReliability Tracker, it is <br />important to consider how a particularly large or small utility can affect the rest of the <br />data. To ease the issues associated with comparability, each utility’s reliability statistics <br />are weighted based on customer count when aggregated. This means that all utilities are <br />equally weighted and all individual statistics are developed on a per customer basis. <br />The aggregate statistics displayed in this report are calculated from 271 utilities that <br />verified their 2020 outage data. Utilities that experienced no outages in 2020, or did not <br />upload any data, will have NULL, nan, or "0" values in their report for utility-specific data <br />and were not included in the aggregate analysis. Also note that log-normal data with a z- <br />score greater than 3.25 will be considered for inclusion and may be excluded if it <br />significantly distorts the aggregate statisitics. <br />250
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.