My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1.5 ERMUSR 05-11-2021
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2014-2024
>
2021
>
05-11-2021
>
1.5 ERMUSR 05-11-2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2021 2:22:13 PM
Creation date
5/7/2021 2:22:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
5/11/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Municipal utilities seek out their community's input and align their plans with the values and <br />desires of customers. Many municipal utilities make dedicated efforts towards accomplishing <br />long-term goals of importance for their community. For example, ERMU has begun giving <br />residents and businesses the option to receive energy from renewable sources. Also, they have <br />made electric vehicles more accessible to the community by offering rebates on chargers. <br />Commitments to clean energy programs like these are helping move our community to a more <br />sustainable future. <br />Another benefit of municipal utilities is cost. According to the American Public Power <br />Association, private utility rates were 14% higher than public rates on average. This may be <br />partly due to the fact that utility companies are natural monopolies. It is not practical and <br />probably not safe to have two power companies delivering service to the same area. Without <br />competition these companies are limited only by government regulated price ceilings. Unlike <br />non-profits, they have the additional expense of state and federal income tax. Since private <br />companies have an incentive to charge their customers more, public utilities save their <br />community money each year. <br />Quality infrastructure is paramount to good utility service. Cost-cutting measures by <br />investor-owned companies result in lower reliability and compromised safety. On the contrary, <br />public power is focused on providing quality services to their city for long periods of time. <br />Reinvesting in infrastructure is more likely with municipal utilities. The System Average <br />Interruptible Duration Index (SAIDI) shows that public-owned utilities have far fewer power <br />outages during the course of a year. In fact, the average time a customer went without power <br />while using municipal utilities was less than half that of the national average. The failure of <br />utilities infrastructure in Texas this past winter is an example of this and proved to be life <br />10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.