My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-22-2020 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2020 - 2029
>
2020
>
12-22-2020 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2021 8:41:41 AM
Creation date
5/5/2021 8:41:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
12/22/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />December 22, 2020 <br />Page 3 <br />and he has not received any complaints for under 1 -acre parcels keeping chickens. <br />He stated he has not had any complaints on those parcels over 2.5 acres. <br />Chair Larson -Vito opened the public hearing. <br />There being no one to speak, Chair Larson -Vito closed the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Jordan stated his views on the keeping of chickens in residential <br />neighborhoods will remain consistent and he is opposed to this amendment. He felt <br />anyone who wanted to keep chickens would not move into the city to keep them. He <br />had similar concerns with lot creep and in the future, the request will be for lots <br />under an acre, which concerns him a lot. He felt a large portion of Elk River is rural <br />and there are mechanisms in place for larger rural lots, noting it was not about lot <br />size but lot location. He stated he is not sure if this is the right amendment to move <br />forward. <br />Commissioner Johnson stated he is in favor of the proposed ordinance amendment. <br />He noted the neighborhoods with homeowner associations or covenants that already <br />prevent residents from keeping agricultural animals. He stated numerous <br />neighborhoods are not going to be impacted by this amendment because of <br />parameters in place to prevent this type of activity. <br />Commissioner Thiel stated he would not support the amendment as written, <br />agreeing with Commissioner Jordan's comments. He felt it was more appropriate for <br />this type of farm animal on a lot larger than 2.5 acres to avoid interfering with <br />neighbors. <br />Commissioner Rydberg stated he agreed with Commissioner Jordan as well and felt <br />the chickens will attract other animals to come into the neighborhood, especially in <br />smaller areas. He stated he felt 1.5. to 2 acres is enough area but not 1 acre lots. He <br />felt an urban setting was just too small. He expressed concerns with requests for <br />other animals like rabbits and dogs will also come forward. <br />Chair Larson -Vito agreed with the others and their comments. She asked if it was a <br />miscommunication to not be included in the work session discussion with the City <br />Council, noting when the original ordinance was drafted in 2017, the Planning <br />Commission spent months reviewing this ordinance. She asked how many requests <br />staff received for an ordinance amendment and if it was enough to offset the <br />completed survey. <br />Mr. Carlton stated staff received about a half dozen requests. He stated the public <br />participation survey that was done in 2017 was extensive and noted most of the <br />survey respondents were comfortable with one acre and above. He stated they could <br />send out another survey to gauge the public's interest over the holidays if the <br />Planning Commission so chose. <br />Chair Larson -Vito stated about five properties in her neighborhood have chicken <br />coops and this time of year, they are very visible and makes the properties appear <br />HpINIaII Ir <br />NA►TUR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.