My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-27-2020 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2020 - 2029
>
2020
>
10-27-2020 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2021 8:38:49 AM
Creation date
5/5/2021 8:38:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
10/27/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />October 27, 2020 <br />Page 4 <br />probably remove the house from the property. He stated their goal was to fix up <br />enough of the property to keep the property respectful and allow her parents to <br />move in in roughly 5-10 years. <br />Commissioner Rydberg asked Mr. DeMars how much money they have put into the <br />home to clean and fix up. <br />Mr. DeMars indicated they have spent approximately $15,000 to start and axe seeing <br />another $10,000 to $15,000 for additional repairs. <br />There being no one else to speak, Chair Larson -Vito closed the public hearing. <br />Chair Larson -Vito stated in her mind there either needs to be the escrow or a time <br />limit. <br />Commissioner Rydberg asked if the use is allowed today, why would it not be <br />allowed in 5-10 years for another party to then request an extension of the IUP. He <br />felt the intention of the $5,000 escrow seems to be excessive in this situation. <br />Commissioner Ovall stated the city council had multiple meetings regarding this and <br />explained there is a lot of history and nuances associated with the history of this <br />property. He stated the council's recommendation of an IUP, while not perfect, was <br />trying to make the best of a bad situation without burdening the buyer. He stated the <br />property has two septic systems, two wells, two utility systems, and no building <br />permits were pulled, but the city recognizes it as a single-family home. He stated <br />their primary concern was to get the applicants through whatever it is, if they sell it <br />or the use changes, the IUP goes away. <br />Chair Larson -Vito stated her suggestion with the sunset in lieu of the $5,000 escrow <br />to avoid tying up the money if their goal was not to sell the property. <br />Commissioner Ovall suggested the commission consider a letter of credit. <br />Commissioner Rydberg asked what the purpose of the $5000 escrow condition. <br />Mr. Leeseberg stated based upon a discussion with the city attorney, the escrow will <br />cover any legal fees incurred by the city to get the property back into compliance <br />should it be abandoned, as an insurance policy of sorts for the city. He indicated <br />staff discussed a timeline and felt this route was solving the problem and not kicking <br />it down the road. <br />Commissioner Thiel asked if the escrow could be used in conjunction with a timeline <br />as a mechanism to convert the home back to a single family residence as that is the <br />ultimate goal of the city, so the sooner they do it, the sooner they get their money <br />back within a five year limit. <br />Mr. Leeseberg stated they could add that as a condition. <br />IIIIREI IE <br />NAWRE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.