07-11-2005 CC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . City Council Minutes July 11, 2005 Page 3 Councilmember Dietz inquired of the bank representatives if what they heard tonight was positive for staying. Mr. Dwyer indicated that it was. Councilmember Morin stated that he agrees with what has been stated tonight and fully supports the use ofTRF for this project. He did indicate apprehension over the parking issue. He is in favor of moving forward but feels we need to look at how we can get additional parking in the doWntown area. Mr. Babcock stated that their major concern in respect to parking is that when they need to do the expansion for the third floor (perhaps several years from now) there will not be an issue regarding parking. He indicated that what they need now is some reasonable assurance that it is understood that should they start doing Phase One soon and Phase Two in the future that the parking won't be an issue in the future. Councilmember Dietz asked for a time frame. Mr. Dwyer stated that they are restricted in their current building for space and need this addition just as soon as possible. It was the consensus of this Council to indicate to future councils that with expansion on this site years from now for a third level, that parking is not an issue that should prevent the planned future expansion. 5.2. Downtown Revitalization Project - Discussion with MetroPlains This portion of the Council Meering was a] oint Meering with the HRA. HRA Chairman Stewart Wilson called the HRA meering to order. Commissioners present were: Louise Kuester,]ean Lieser, Larry Toth and Paul Morin. Director of Economic Development Catherine Mehelich presented her staff report. Vern Hanson of MetroPlains Development and Michele Mongeon of ]LG Architects were present. Mr. Hanson explained that they have come back with a revised version of the Bluffs of Elk River project, keeping the original character of the sketch as well as providing the overall context to the City of the whole project. Ms. Mongeon indicated that the new revision shows the main part of the building extending westerly popping up the three southerly pieces. She stated that detailing of the top piece is much more prominent. She stated that the corner element is slightly taller with recessed balconies. This current perspective illustrates recessing brick between the two windows with some subtle changes in the rear. Councilmember Morin asked if the back piece is set back. Ms. Mongeon indicated that the red piece is in the same plane with the brick veneer sticking out. She stated if you look at the floor plan this would be on the same plane. The red brick sticks out in front of the buff colored portion of the building. Councilmember Gumphrey inquired as to how much higher the tower is. Ms. Mongeon indicated 18 - 20 inches. Councilmember Gumphrey inquired if there would be a separate balcony on the fourth floor for each unit. Ms. Mongeon replied that they are working with a market study advisor in keeping this option flexible. She stated that some people may wish to have two-space areas.