7.2 SR 04-19-2021 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission During the public hearing, a neighbor expressed concerns with the CUP stating approval would dramatically affect their property use and enjoyment (CUP standard #1). Specifically, related to animal noise, odor, and how those impact enjoyment outside on their patio. He also expressed concerns with safety regarding the pigs (CUP standard #1) and asked if there would always be two pigs on the property or just for a few months out of the year. Property value and future salability of his property was also a concern. The applicant explained the goats are Nigerian dwarf goats, a smaller, quieter goat which will keep noise down. He stated they are trying to locate the animals away from property lines and adjoining residents to minimize noise but indicates they also hear noise from other neighboring properties, such as dogs barking from a neighboring dog breeder and another neighbor who raises chickens. He indicated the pigs will be in their own pen which is located within the perimeter fencing. The commission expressed general concerns with agricultural animals on smaller lots. It was asked if a condition triggering the cancellation of the CUP could be added if the city receives "X number" of complaints. The city attorney clarified CUPS confer a property right that can be revoked for violation of a condition, but only after due process (notice, hearing, etc.). There can be no automatic revocation because of complaints. Also, adding a condition related to complaints is not the best approach as it may cause residents to generate invalid complaints. The pigs generated the most concern. Citing an insect problem, which could be resolved within a manure management plan, but that is not required under the ordinance as they are not exceeding the permitted number of animal units per acre. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request but suggested the ordinance may need to be reviewed in the future. The applicant contacted city staff after the meeting and stated they are willing to forego the keeping of pigs if that becomes a contentious issue. They would instead maintain other animals, but never exceed the permitted number of animal units as determined by city ordinance. Financial Impact None Mission/Policy/Goal ■ Support property owner needs and goals Attachments ■ Planning Commission Memo dated March 23, 2021 N:\Public Bodies\Agenda Packets\04-19-2021\Final\7.2 sr.docx