My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2. SR 04-12-2021
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2021 - 2030
>
2021
>
04-12-2021 BOARD OF APPEAL
>
2. SR 04-12-2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2021 9:50:33 AM
Creation date
4/7/2021 9:49:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/12/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board of Appeal and Equalization Handbook <br />The Notice of Valuation and Classification will direct property owners to the Minnesota Department of Revenue website <br />(http://www.revenue.state.mn.us) for information on the appeal process and how to substantiate appeals. Many <br />counties also have information on their websites concerning how to appeal, property information, frequently asked <br />questions, etc. If your county website does have information relating to assessment or property taxes, it is a good idea to <br />become familiar with this information so you can refer property owners to it <br />. <br />Hearing appeals <br />The Board Chair should call the appellant. The board must be attentive when the appeals are being presented. Take the <br />time to listen to the person presenting the appeal, but do not let the appellant dominate the meeting. <br />After an appellant has presented his/her case, the chair should ask the assessor to explain how the value and/or <br />classification was determined. To keep things moving and to conduct a fair meeting, any time limits imposed on an <br />appellant should also be imposed on the assessor. <br />The board should ask questions of the appellant and the assessor if more information is needed. <br />Depending on the procedure that the board is following, the chair should either: <br />Have the board make a decision on theappeal; or <br />Inform the appellant that his/her concern will be taken into consideration and let the appellant know when a decision <br />will be made, as well as how he/she will be informed of the board’sdecision. <br />Review process, not value-reduction process <br />The appeal process is a review process and not just a value-reduction process. The Board of Appeal and Equalization is an <br />important step in maintaining an equitable property tax system. It is vital that the board members take this responsibility <br />seriously. Any value changes –increases or decreases –must be justified as value changes have the effect of shifting the tax <br />burden to other property owners in the jurisdiction. <br />The purpose of the board is to ensure equality between taxpayers so that each taxpayer is paying the fair share of taxes –no <br />more, no less. Keeping in mind that a reduction in estimated market value may not reduce taxes, and sharing this <br />information with appellants, may help set the proper tone for the meeting. <br />Therefore, it is not incumbent upon the board to reduce the value of all individuals who appeal to the board, as that may be <br />unfair to the property owners who have not appealed. The board should not give reductions to people just for “showing up.” <br />It is assumed that the assessor has properly valued and classified all property in the jurisdiction. The burden of proof rests <br />with the property owner who must present factual evidence to disprove the assessor’s value or classification. All changes <br />made by the board must be based on facts. <br />25 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.