My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-01-2021 Regular CCM
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
02-01-2021 Regular CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2021 9:54:20 AM
Creation date
2/18/2021 9:54:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
2/1/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes <br />February 1, 2021 <br />Page 6 <br />necessarily mean it would always be a golf course, just that it couldn't be used as <br />anything else. <br />Mayor Dietz questioned if the city could require financing through a contract for <br />deed so it would revert to the city in default. Attorney Beck stated the city can <br />require financing through a contract for deed in the request for proposals. <br />Councilmember Westgaard questioned what happens to the existing maintenance <br />arrangement with Elk River Golf Club and expressed concern if this process goes on <br />too long it may affect arrangements for opening. <br />Mayor Dietz explained the agreement requires 120 days' notice by either party. He <br />added Elk River Golf Club could choose to let us out of the agreement early, but <br />they are not obligated. <br />Councilmember Westgaard indicated he believes the right thing to do is to look at <br />other offers. He explained selling the golf course has been a topic of the Council <br />since it was purchased, and he wouldn't mind selling it. He noted he does believe <br />Pinewood is a great amenity and jewel of the community. <br />Councilmember Wagner indicated she believes it is in the best interest of the city for <br />the Council to seek legal counsel if going out for multiple proposals so the proposals <br />can be vetted properly. She understands the timeline but wants to ensure due <br />diligence to protect the city and the taxpayers. <br />Council questioned the timeline for a request for proposals. Attorney Beck explained <br />there is no set timeline because property is not subject to the contract law. He <br />suggested having staff prepare an RFP so the Council can approve what information <br />is going to be requested. He added having a deadline of 30 days is good, but the <br />Council could shorten to a couple weeks if they desire. He urged caution to the <br />Council if they follow the contract law requirements too closely, they could be held <br />to those requirements. <br />Mayor Dietz clarified the Council could be judged more harshly if going out for <br />proposals. Attorney Beck explained not necessarily. He suggested going out for <br />proposals clearly outlining the process in the request for proposal. <br />Mayor Dietz expressed an interest in giving the public two weeks to submit <br />proposals. <br />Council consensus was for staff to draft a Request for Proposal and bring back for <br />review at the next Council meeting. <br />Mayor Dietz encouraged Mr. Birdsall and Ms. Abrahamson to submit a request for <br />proposal. He added he is amazed at all the emails he received of people speaking to <br />the character of Trevor and Jennifer and he hopes they understand the process and <br />don't get discouraged. <br />! I E I E/ 1 1 <br />NATURE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.