My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9.1 SR 02-16-2021
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2021 - 2030
>
2021
>
02-16-2021
>
9.1 SR 02-16-2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2021 10:36:32 AM
Creation date
2/12/2021 10:52:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/16/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL RESOURCES <br />August 31, 2018 <br />City of Elk River Planning Commission <br />13065 Orono Parkway <br />Elk River MN 55330 <br />Ecological and Water Resources Division <br />RE: MISSISSIPPI RIVER DEVELOPMENT CUP for PI # 75-521-0110 and 75-521-0120 <br />Dear City of Elk River Planning Commission, <br />1035 5 Benton Dr. <br />Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 <br />I have reviewed the submitted plans for a CUP to construct a multi -family development unit along the <br />Mississippi River, I have found the following issues. <br />The construction plans do not show the height of the building but the plans do show that the building will be a 4 <br />story building. I do not know if this building will meet the height restriction of 30 feet per Sec 30-2022 (c). A <br />Height greater than 30 feet could alter the scenic, historical, natural value that was outlined in Minnesota <br />Statute 103F.315. Typically 4 story buildings are a greater height then 30 feet. <br />The location of the building along with subsequent water retention ponds and other infrastructure could <br />destabilize the bluff. The location of the retention pond is of concern as it will be placing head pressure on the <br />side slopes of the pond along with more water being placed in the pore spaces of the soil in this location which <br />could destabilize the bluff. The retention pond plans show that they removing what appears to be the top of the <br />bluff. I would advise having the applicant change the placement of the retention pond to the side of the building <br />and further away from the bluff. <br />In addition to the above mentioned structures, placing a parking lot at the 100 year flood elevation or slightly <br />above could require the applicant to meet sec 30-1913 paragraph 5. Vehicles could be viewed as equipment that <br />is flammable, explosive or potentially injurious to humans, animals or plant life. This would require a plan <br />approved by the city council. In addition to the floodplain concern placing a driveway/roadway on the bluff is <br />not recommended due to the level of grading and manipulation required to establish said driveway/road. This <br />could also cause erosional issues and destabilize the bluff from having a smooth surface for the water run long <br />which would increase the velocity of this runoff. Since this is a semi-public space there are safety concerns for <br />vehicle and pedestrian traffic due to the slope. Creating a parking lot in this location could also conflict with you <br />clearcutting code. <br />Sincerely, <br />James Bedell <br />Area Hydrologist <br />11035 S Benton Dr.1 Sauk Rapids, MN 53379 j (320) 223-7850 1 ;arnes.bedell state.ntn.us I <br />Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Division of Ecological and Water Resources <br />800 Oak Savanna Ln. SW Cambridge MN 55008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.