Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />LAKE ORONO FISH RESTOCKING 2021 COST PROPOSAL <br />OVERVIEW <br />1. Project Background and Description <br /> With the upcoming LORE project we inquired into different options that could be taken to improve the <br />fish survival while the 6.5’ drawdown was in place. The fish are confined to the few “deeper” areas of the <br />lake during this time and are especially vulnerable and easy to target in these conditions. The primary <br />concern that we have heard from lake owners and community fisherman is the potential damaging effect <br />the LORE project will have on the fish population. When the lake drawdown first occurred there was an <br />estimated 500+ adult fish that were driven over the dam and rescued from the lower pools to be <br />released into the Mississippi River by concerned lake owners. Given these numbers we conservatively <br />estimate at least 5,000 fish were lost over the dam during the initial drawdown. Another lake owner has <br />documented a weekly average of 15+ fish kill walking the same 400 foot stretch of shoreline along Main <br />Street since the drawdown has been in place. <br />The DNR was unable to issue a temporary restriction on fishing during the LORE project to reduce the <br />threat of overfishing but has instead supported installing an aeration system. A lake owner offered use of <br />a ½ HP Kasco surface aerator but our expert aeration sources found this system to be inefficient and not <br />up to the task. Recommended by the DNR, installing a 3 HP Aire O2 surface aspirator would reduce <br />overfishing by preventing fishing directly over the deepest fish habitat where they will gather due to the <br />lowered lake levels. After consulting with ERMU the electrical infrastructure in the proximity of where <br />the aspirator would be placed (off the West point of the Orono cemetery) would not be sufficient for the <br />3HP unit. Instead a 2HP, single phase unit was quoted and required a higher gauge cable which in result <br />increased the estimated cost to $9,7852.86. Initially we were estimating the cost to be $4-5,000 and that <br />has doubled due to the higher material costs and additional electrical requirements that were not <br />anticipated. <br />At this time due to the increased costs we are proposing as an alternative to installing an aerator, and as <br />recommended by the DNR, use of funds from the LORE project for fish restocking in partnership with the <br />DNR. Joe Stewig, DNR Area Fisheries Manager has been very helpful and has offered to partner with us to <br />determine what the fish population is in the spring and work with us to restock. The goal would be to <br />replace any fish kill with fingerling and adult species that would be able to spawn in the upcoming <br />season. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />