Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SUMMARY OF RESEARCH AND RECOMMENDED STRATEGIES <br />EDA STRATEGIC PLAN 17 <br />6. INCENTIVES FOR BUSINESS ATTRACTION/RETENTION <br />For better or worse, public financial incentives that are offered to new industrial <br />developments are a factor in their locational decisions. Having said that, incentives are <br />usually not the overriding factor for a locational decision, because the fundamental <br />strengths and weaknesses of a location have a greater impact on the long-run success of a <br />business. <br />Elk River has utilized a broad set of incentives to attract new business development, but for <br />new development on previously undeveloped land, tax abatement has been the most <br />important source of financial support—as is true for many similar cities. <br />When Elk River provides tax abatement for new facility development, it benefits from the <br />practice of Sherburne County to match its abatement with a comparable abatement of <br />county property taxes. That essentially doubles the impact of Elk River tax abatement <br />decisions. <br />The level of incentive provided to a development is subject to negotiation between the City <br />and the developer. Some cities establish clear policies relative to the level of tax <br />abatement they will provide, which simplifies communication and reduces the time involved <br />in negotiation. Chaska is an example of that, as we learned in our peer city interview with <br />Assistant City Administrator Nate Kabat. The City offers new businesses/expansion tax <br />abatement for a total of three times the annual total of new property taxes generated. The <br />City of Elk River could also establish policies that provide for a certain level of tax <br />abatement for target industries and a different set for other industrial development. We see <br />a benefit to Elk River in establishing a policy that sets an attractive yet reasonable level of <br />tax abatement support that is available, and in so doing reduces the negotiation that is <br />required for determining the level of incentives for any given business applicant. <br />The Business Microloan program has a number of subprograms, some of which have been <br />seldom utilized. A review of little used programs could result in allowing some to expire. In <br />other cases the subprogram may require additional resources to be useful to its intended <br />recipients. <br />Strategies/Actions <br />6a. Establish a tax abatement policy that sets a standard for the amount of tax abatement <br />the City will provide for business attraction. <br />6b. Reevaluate the subprograms encompassed under the Business Microloan program, <br />and determine whether underutilized programs should be eliminated or retooled. <br />6c. Increase marketing for the newly adopted Energy Incentive Program to increase its <br />visibility and utilization. <br />