My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
EDA Special Meeting Packet 11-09-2020
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2014-2020
>
2020
>
11-09-2020 SPECIAL
>
EDA Special Meeting Packet 11-09-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2020 2:25:15 PM
Creation date
11/5/2020 2:23:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
11/9/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />SUMMARY OF RESEARCH AND RECOMMENDED STRATEGIES <br />EDA STRATEGIC PLAN 39 <br />10. INCENTIVES FOR REDEVELOPMENT <br />Redevelopment projects will typically require public sector financial support in all but the <br />strongest market locations. This financial support is offset by the benefits that <br />developments bring to local communities. They may provide housing formats that are <br />needed, or add ground floor retail businesses. They may contribute activity and <br />streetlife, remediate a site that was past its prime, and meet other identified public goals. <br />They are generally speaking also beneficial in the long run from a public financial <br />perspective—providing years of additional property tax revenues after the incentive <br />amount has been recouped. <br />The general need for and appropriate use of incentives for redevelopment was <br />reinforced in our peer city interviews. Public financial support was required for most if <br />not all redevelopment in Oakdale, Forest Lake and Chaska. Public financial support <br />was also required for most new multifamily housing development. <br />In Minnesota, the predominant form of financial subsidy for such projects is tax <br />increment financing (TIF) where that is viable. TIF has two important benefits. First, it <br />doesn’t come at the expense of other city budget items. It consists entirely of future <br />property tax revenues, which are returned to the developer or developer’s lender for a <br />certain number of years. Second, the City’s share of foregone property tax revenues <br />are matched by the contribution of county and school district property tax revenues. <br />That is a differentiator in comparison to tax abatement, because City tax abatement <br />actions are only matched by the county and school district if they also explicitly take that <br />action. <br />The concern about over-enriching a developer by awarding TIF financing can be <br />mitigated by having the TIF request analyzed by the City’s financial advisor. <br />Strategies/Actions <br />10a. Update the City's tax increment financing policy statements to support its use for <br />any redevelopment project, housing project, or mixed use project that is consistent <br />with City plans and policies <br />10b. Utilize the City's financial advisor to ensure that tax increment financing is scaled <br />to the genuine needs of the project <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.