Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Minutes <br />March 28, 2017 <br />Page 7 <br />Councilmember Wagner asked how the size of the chicken coops would be regulated. Ms. <br />Simon explained that typical lots are allowed 1,200 square feet of accessory structure <br />including attached and detached, and that only 2 detached structures are allowed. The <br />maximum number of detached structures allowed on large lots is 4. Councilmember Wagner <br />asked if the property owner would be required to take down the coop if it was no longer in <br />use. Ms. Simon stated no, it would be the same as any other detached structure. <br />Discussion followed regarding opaque fencing of the coops and runs. It was the consensus <br />of the Commission that requiring opaque fencing of the coops or runs themselves would <br />defeat the purpose of raising free-range/cage-free chickens. Further discussion followed <br />regarding multi -family residences. It was the consensus that raising chickens would not be <br />an option for multi -family or two-family residential. <br />Chair Johnson opened the public hearing. <br />Dan Cooper, 17869 Lincoln Street NW, stated that he lived on a 1-acre lot and had chickens. <br />He stated that opaque fencing would not be conducive to healthy chickens. He stated that <br />he did not feel fencing was necessary on his approximately 1 acre lot which backs up to park <br />land. He stated that if fencing were required, he could build one for about $200 if he did all <br />the work himself. Mr. Cooper discussed the benefits of raising chickens. He stated that an <br />opaque fence would be too expensive and would cost $900 or more. Mr. Cooper asked why <br />compliance checks are being proposed, as the only city that requires them is Hastings. He <br />stated that there are no compliance checks for dogs and their kennels/shelters and felt this <br />would be unfair since their chickens are pets. Mr. Cooper stated that Elk River's ordinance <br />as proposed would be the second most restrictive of all of the cities allowing this use. <br />Greg Wierschke, 19227 Yale Street NW, stated he has had the opportunity to raise chicken <br />near a residential neighborhood on the Burandt property for the last four years. He stated <br />that he has found the best shelter to be 8'x 8' x 2'. He stated he only has had one predator <br />problem in that time. Mr. Wierschke suggested that applicants provide an invoice that the <br />states the chickens were purchased from a hatchery registered with the government, to <br />ensure they are disease -free. He stated that his runs and coops are portable and can be taken <br />apart and moved. He stated that the permanent structures being discussed would cost $900 <br />- $1,000 and his cost $200 - $500. He stated that the chickens can be kept safe and away <br />from view. <br />Lori Richard, 14381 1906' Ave NW, stated that the number of chickens per lot size needs to <br />be reconsidered. She stated that 4 chickens are not very many and small properties could <br />easily accommodate more than 4, since they don't take up much room. She stated she raises <br />chickens and has no problems with animals. She stated that locking up the chickens in the <br />coop at night prevents predators from coming around. She felt that a 1-acre lot could easily <br />accommodate 10 —14 chickens. <br />There being no further public comment, Chair Johnson closed the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Rydberg suggested that some research could be done on disease issues. He <br />stated he was in favor of postponing this amendment to next month's Planning Commission <br />