My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES 11-02-2020
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2020
>
11-02-2020
>
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES 11-02-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2020 10:59:39 AM
Creation date
10/30/2020 9:14:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/2/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes Page 9 <br />October 5, 2020 <br />----------------------------- <br /> <br />Councilmember Ovall stated this scheduled can be more business friendly. <br /> <br />Mayor Dietz stated it would be easy for the city to justify the fees due to the amount <br />of work the Met Council puts into the schedule. <br /> <br />Council consensus was to adopt the schedule. <br /> <br />Mr. Beck stated the water access charge would also be determined via the Met <br />Council schedule and Elk River Municipal Utilities is fine with it. <br /> <br />10.3 Ordinance Amendment: Authorize Loans for Repair or Replacement <br />of Private Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems <br /> <br /> Ms. Fischer presented the staff report. <br /> <br />Council consensus was to move forward with an ordinance amendment. <br /> <br />Mr. Beck discussed the two state programs. He noted if the state ever discontinued <br />their programs or utilized all the funds, the city could self-fund a program. <br /> <br />10.4 Trail Turnover to City <br /> <br />Mr. Leeseberg presented Mr. Carlton’s staff report. He noted the city has been <br />maintaining the trail. <br /> <br />Mr. Beck stated at one time Council may have decided this portion of trail wasn’t <br />part of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, but at some point, the city started <br />maintaining it. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ovall questioned if it is in the current Plan. <br /> <br />Mayor Dietz questioned if this should be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Consensus was to have the Parks and Recreation Commission review the request. <br /> <br />10.5 HVAC Upgrades: CARES Funding <br /> <br />Mr. Portner presented the staff report. He discussed how staff had been working <br />with Apex prior to the CARES Act being implemented, but then they switched gears <br />to have a two-track process: one for energy efficiency, the other for health and <br />human safety. <br /> <br />Greg Ackerson and Rob Krukoski, Apex Facility Solutions, discussed who Apex is, <br />energy efficiency items versus the CARES Act, a project breakout, and next steps for <br />action. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.